Mees RottgeringvsHugo Grenier
HGYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Hugo Grenier 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Mees Rottgering |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Mees Rottgering Mees Rottgering is a Dutch hard-court specialist with solid ATP Challenger results on North American hard courts; Hugo Grenier is a French p...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are mid-level ATP competitors (Rottgering and Grenier) likely to contest at least three sets in a Winston-Salem Open first or s... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Hugo Grenier |
68%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Hugo Grenier Grenier holds a higher ranking and more professional experience than the young Rottgering. Hard-court results favor Grenier in recent season...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
under_2.5 Best-of-three format on outdoor hard typically produces straight-set wins when experience gap is large. Grenier's serve should limit breaks... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Hugo Grenier |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Hugo Grenier Based on training data up to my last knowledge cut-off, Hugo Grenier is the more experienced and established player on the professional circ...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Even though Hugo Grenier is favored, younger or less established players like Mees Rottgering can often challenge more experienced opponents... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
68%
Hugo Grenier |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Hugo Grenier Hugo Grenier is a more established player with a higher career-high ranking and more experience on the ATP Challenger Tour. While Mees Rottg...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 Given that Grenier is favored, it's plausible he will win in straight sets. However, Rottgering is capable of taking a set, especially if he...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Mees Rottgering |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Mees Rottgering Training data through 2025-09. Rottgering is a promising young talent with strong recent form on hard courts, while Grenier, though experien...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both players have similar service holds and return games, suggesting a close match that could go the distance. Rottgering's youth and Grenie... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusHugo Grenier 3/5
Mees Rottgering is a Dutch hard-court specialist with solid ATP Challenger results on North American hard courts; Hugo Grenier is a French p...
Grenier holds a higher ranking and more professional experience than the young Rottgering. Hard-court results favor Grenier in recent season...
Based on training data up to my last knowledge cut-off, Hugo Grenier is the more experienced and established player on the professional circ...
Hugo Grenier is a more established player with a higher career-high ranking and more experience on the ATP Challenger Tour. While Mees Rottg...
Training data through 2025-09. Rottgering is a promising young talent with strong recent form on hard courts, while Grenier, though experien...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 3/10
Both players are mid-level ATP competitors (Rottgering and Grenier) likely to contest at least three sets in a Winston-Salem Open first or s...
Best-of-three format on outdoor hard typically produces straight-set wins when experience gap is large. Grenier's serve should limit breaks...
Even though Hugo Grenier is favored, younger or less established players like Mees Rottgering can often challenge more experienced opponents...
Given that Grenier is favored, it's plausible he will win in straight sets. However, Rottgering is capable of taking a set, especially if he...
Both players have similar service holds and return games, suggesting a close match that could go the distance. Rottgering's youth and Grenie...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Hugo Grenier
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Hugo Grenier
DeepSeek V3
Mees Rottgering
Claude Haiku 4.5
Mees Rottgering
Grok 4 Fast
Hugo Grenier
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
618b5808d3474523…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 17:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30525,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T17:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Hugo Grenier",
"home": "Mees Rottgering"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.