Mayar SherifvsAlycia Parks
APYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alycia Parks 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Alycia Parks |
57%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alycia Parks Alycia Parks is a rising American talent with superior athletic tools and break-point conversion, particularly on hard courts. Mayar Sherif,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
Over 2.5 Both players are competitive mid-tier WTA players without dominant serves, suggesting multiple set breaks and tight scorelines. Sherif's def... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Mayar Sherif |
58%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Mayar Sherif Sherif has shown stronger recent consistency on hard courts in training data through 2025-09 while Parks relies on serve volatility that can...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over_2.5 Best-of-3 format with both players capable of holding serve leads to frequent three-set matches per historical patterns. Parks' power game o... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Alycia Parks |
58%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Alycia Parks Based on my training data through late 2025, Alycia Parks possesses a powerful serve and groundstrokes that are highly effective on hard cou...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 sets Given Alycia Parks' hard-court advantage and powerful game, she is capable of winning in straight sets if she serves well and keeps her unfo... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Mayar Sherif |
60%
Alycia Parks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Mayar Sherif Mayar Sherif is a more experienced player on the WTA tour and generally performs better on hard court surfaces, which is likely the surface...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Alycia Parks This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players with similar current form. Sherif's consistency on hard courts might gi... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
63%
Alycia Parks |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
63%
Alycia Parks No live access at prediction time; this is from training data through 2025-09 and general player profiles. Parks owns the bigger serve and m...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Parks' power gives her the higher ceiling, but her return consistency and shot tolerance are the classic weaknesses that let inferior movers... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlycia Parks 3/5
Alycia Parks is a rising American talent with superior athletic tools and break-point conversion, particularly on hard courts. Mayar Sherif,...
Sherif has shown stronger recent consistency on hard courts in training data through 2025-09 while Parks relies on serve volatility that can...
Based on my training data through late 2025, Alycia Parks possesses a powerful serve and groundstrokes that are highly effective on hard cou...
Mayar Sherif is a more experienced player on the WTA tour and generally performs better on hard court surfaces, which is likely the surface...
No live access at prediction time; this is from training data through 2025-09 and general player profiles. Parks owns the bigger serve and m...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Both players are competitive mid-tier WTA players without dominant serves, suggesting multiple set breaks and tight scorelines. Sherif's def...
Best-of-3 format with both players capable of holding serve leads to frequent three-set matches per historical patterns. Parks' power game o...
Given Alycia Parks' hard-court advantage and powerful game, she is capable of winning in straight sets if she serves well and keeps her unfo...
This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players with similar current form. Sherif's consistency on hard courts might gi...
Parks' power gives her the higher ceiling, but her return consistency and shot tolerance are the classic weaknesses that let inferior movers...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Alycia Parks
DeepSeek V3
Alycia Parks
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alycia Parks
Grok 4 Fast
Mayar Sherif
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Mayar Sherif
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
6cce3e455d87cdb5…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 13 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 42052,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Guadalajara Open presentado por Santander",
"starts_at": "2026-09-13T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 13 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alycia Parks",
"home": "Mayar Sherif"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.