Mattia BelluccivsMartin Landaluce
MLYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Mattia Bellucci 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Mattia Bellucci |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Mattia Bellucci Mattia Bellucci is an established ATP-level player with consistent hard-court experience, while Martin Landaluce is a rising prospect with l...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 At ATP 250 level, matches between mid-ranked and rising players often produce competitive sets. Bellucci's experience and Landaluce's potent... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Mattia Bellucci |
62%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Mattia Bellucci Bellucci holds a slight edge on hard courts from prior seasons and the match occurs on outdoor hard where his movement is reliable. Landaluc...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under ATP 250 matches on hard frequently finish in straight sets when both players serve well. Limited fatigue factors for an early-round encounte... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Martin Landaluce |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Martin Landaluce Based on general player profiles from training data, Martin Landaluce, a highly-rated junior with a game well-suited for hard courts, is pro...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Given that Martin Landaluce's projected growth may involve some inconsistency against established players like Mattia Bellucci, a competitiv... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Bellucci |
60%
Martin Landaluce |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Bellucci Based on training data, Mattia Bellucci has shown a stronger trajectory and better performance on hard courts compared to Martin Landaluce....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Martin Landaluce Given Bellucci's favored status and the projected closer match, a two-set victory for Bellucci is the most probable outcome. While Landaluce... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Mattia Bellucci |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Mattia Bellucci Training data through 2025-09: Bellucci has a higher ranking and more experience on hard courts, which should give him a slight edge. Landal...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Given the competitive nature and the young age of both players, a three-set match is likely. Landaluce has shown ability to push matches to... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMattia Bellucci 3/5
Mattia Bellucci is an established ATP-level player with consistent hard-court experience, while Martin Landaluce is a rising prospect with l...
Bellucci holds a slight edge on hard courts from prior seasons and the match occurs on outdoor hard where his movement is reliable. Landaluc...
Based on general player profiles from training data, Martin Landaluce, a highly-rated junior with a game well-suited for hard courts, is pro...
Based on training data, Mattia Bellucci has shown a stronger trajectory and better performance on hard courts compared to Martin Landaluce....
Training data through 2025-09: Bellucci has a higher ranking and more experience on hard courts, which should give him a slight edge. Landal...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
At ATP 250 level, matches between mid-ranked and rising players often produce competitive sets. Bellucci's experience and Landaluce's potent...
ATP 250 matches on hard frequently finish in straight sets when both players serve well. Limited fatigue factors for an early-round encounte...
Given that Martin Landaluce's projected growth may involve some inconsistency against established players like Mattia Bellucci, a competitiv...
Given Bellucci's favored status and the projected closer match, a two-set victory for Bellucci is the most probable outcome. While Landaluce...
Given the competitive nature and the young age of both players, a three-set match is likely. Landaluce has shown ability to push matches to...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Bellucci
Claude Haiku 4.5
Mattia Bellucci
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Martin Landaluce
DeepSeek V3
Mattia Bellucci
Grok 4 Fast
Mattia Bellucci
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d816c0f72da9921a…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29764,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Martin Landaluce",
"home": "Mattia Bellucci"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.