Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Tennis AITO Hangzhou Open
Upcoming · in 15h 49m
MD

Matthew DellavedovavsSun Fajing

SF
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 12picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

32 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Sun Fajing 2/4
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Sun Fajing

Matthew Dellavedova is primarily known as an NBA basketball player, not a professional tennis competitor, which suggests either a data error...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Sun Fajing

Matthew Dellavedova is primarily known as an NBA basketball player, not a professional tennis competitor, which suggests either a data error...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 75% Sun Fajing

Matthew Dellavedova has a superior hard-court record, with 63 wins and 25 losses, compared to Sun Fajing's 25 wins and 21 losses. Dellavedov...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 75% Sun Fajing

Matthew Dellavedova has a superior hard-court record, with 63 wins and 25 losses, compared to Sun Fajing's 25 wins and 21 losses. Dellavedov...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Matthew Dellavedova

Dellavedova's ATP experience and serve give him the edge on hard courts despite age; Sun Fajing lacks consistent results against former top-...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Matthew Dellavedova

Dellavedova's ATP experience and serve give him the edge on hard courts despite age; Sun Fajing lacks consistent results against former top-...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 62% Matthew Dellavedova

No live tool access here, so this is from training data through 2025-09, plus general ATP Challenger/qualifier-level context. Dellavedova is...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 62% Matthew Dellavedova

No live tool access here, so this is from training data through 2025-09, plus general ATP Challenger/qualifier-level context. Dellavedova is...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 1.5 1/8
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Over 1.5

If Sun Fajing is the clear favorite, a straight-sets win (1–0) is plausible but not overwhelming. Professional tennis matches at WTA/ITF lev...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Over 1.5

If Sun Fajing is the clear favorite, a straight-sets win (1–0) is plausible but not overwhelming. Professional tennis matches at WTA/ITF lev...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over_3.5

Given Dellavedova's superior hard-court performance and Fajing's recent loss in a three-set match, it's likely the match will extend beyond...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over_3.5

Given Dellavedova's superior hard-court performance and Fajing's recent loss in a three-set match, it's likely the match will extend beyond...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 68% under_2.5

Hard-court surface favors Dellavedova's serve, pointing to straight-sets win. Younger Sun Fajing unlikely to force a decider against a veter...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 68% under_2.5

Hard-court surface favors Dellavedova's serve, pointing to straight-sets win. Younger Sun Fajing unlikely to force a decider against a veter...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Sun Fajing

Best-of-3 matches at this level often go the distance when the lower-ranked player is competitive on serve, and Sun Fajing has shown the abi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Sun Fajing

Best-of-3 matches at this level often go the distance when the lower-ranked player is competitive on serve, and Sun Fajing has shown the abi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Sun Fajing

75
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Sun Fajing

75
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Sun Fajing

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Sun Fajing

62
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Matthew Dellavedova

62
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Matthew Dellavedova

62
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Matthew Dellavedova

62
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Matthew Dellavedova

62

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 290–182 · 61%
+135.0u
GPT-5
GPT-5 290–182 · 61%
+135.0u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 308–230 · 57%
-34.8u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 308–230 · 57%
-34.8u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 2462–2037 · 55%
-1,644.7u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 2462–2037 · 55%
-1,644.7u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 260–224 · 54%
+223.5u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 260–224 · 54%
+223.5u
o4-mini
o4-mini 180–156 · 54%
+139.4u
o4-mini
o4-mini 180–156 · 54%
+139.4u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 1486–1291 · 54%
-849.2u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 1486–1291 · 54%
-849.2u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 386–346 · 53%
-95.2u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 386–346 · 53%
-95.2u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 264–248 · 52%
+187.2u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 264–248 · 52%
+187.2u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 366–352 · 51%
-127.1u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 366–352 · 51%
-127.1u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 918–964 · 49%
-647.5u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 918–964 · 49%
-647.5u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 2148–2307 · 48%
-1,981.1u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 2148–2307 · 48%
-1,981.1u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 3387–3706 · 48%
-3,222.9u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 3387–3706 · 48%
-3,222.9u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 4058–4472 · 48%
-4,101.3u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 4058–4472 · 48%
-4,101.3u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 4073–4686 · 47%
-4,068.9u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 4073–4686 · 47%
-4,068.9u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 302–358 · 46%
-147.7u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 302–358 · 46%
-147.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 3384–4028 · 46%
-3,625.6u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 3384–4028 · 46%
-3,625.6u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Team news

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 7d8d7afff0cd02ef…
Kickoff
Tue, Sep 22 · 07:00 GMT+0200
Markets
Match winner · Total sets · Total games
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 47875,
        "sport": "tennis",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "Hangzhou Open",
        "starts_at": "2026-09-22T07:00:00+02:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 22 Sep 2026 05:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Sun Fajing",
        "home": "Matthew Dellavedova"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
        "Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
        "Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
        "Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals_sets",
        "totals_games"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    3 tool calls · 3 sources

    3 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →