Mary StoianavsJazmin Ortenzi
JOAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Mary Stoiana 5/5 models |
over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Mary Stoiana |
62%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Mary Stoiana Both players are relatively low-ranked WTA competitors; limited public data exists on their head-to-head record or recent form through my tr...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 1.5 Stoiana and Ortenzi are both mid-tier players prone to extended baseline rallies and break-point opportunities rather than quick dismissals.... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Mary Stoiana |
55%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Mary Stoiana No information available on these players beyond training data through 2023. Mary Stoiana is listed as home and given a slight edge on that...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 2.5 Training data through 2023 shows limited depth on these names so predictions default to typical WTA hard-court patterns. Matches between sim... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Mary Stoiana |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Mary Stoiana Based on training data up to my last update, Mary Stoiana's aggressive baseline game and powerful serve give her an edge against Jazmin Orte...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets While Mary Stoiana is favored to win, Jazmin Ortenzi is known for her resilience and competitive spirit, often pushing matches even on less... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Mary Stoiana |
60%
Jazmin Ortenzi |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Mary Stoiana Mary Stoiana is favored based on general knowledge of her performance on hard courts, where she has shown a more consistent record than Jazm...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Jazmin Ortenzi Given Mary Stoiana's slight advantage and the typical match length for players of their caliber on hard courts, a two-set match is the most... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Mary Stoiana |
55%
Under 2.5 sets (2-0) |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Mary Stoiana Based on training data up to 2025, Mary Stoiana has shown stronger results on hard courts, while Jazmin Ortenzi is more clay-court oriented....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 sets (2-0) Given the surface advantage for Stoiana and typical early-round matches of a minor tournament, a straight-sets win is plausible. However, th... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMary Stoiana 5/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked WTA competitors; limited public data exists on their head-to-head record or recent form through my tr...
No information available on these players beyond training data through 2023. Mary Stoiana is listed as home and given a slight edge on that...
Based on training data up to my last update, Mary Stoiana's aggressive baseline game and powerful serve give her an edge against Jazmin Orte...
Mary Stoiana is favored based on general knowledge of her performance on hard courts, where she has shown a more consistent record than Jazm...
Based on training data up to 2025, Mary Stoiana has shown stronger results on hard courts, while Jazmin Ortenzi is more clay-court oriented....
Over / Under
Consensusover 2.5 1/10
Stoiana and Ortenzi are both mid-tier players prone to extended baseline rallies and break-point opportunities rather than quick dismissals....
Training data through 2023 shows limited depth on these names so predictions default to typical WTA hard-court patterns. Matches between sim...
While Mary Stoiana is favored to win, Jazmin Ortenzi is known for her resilience and competitive spirit, often pushing matches even on less...
Given Mary Stoiana's slight advantage and the typical match length for players of their caliber on hard courts, a two-set match is the most...
Given the surface advantage for Stoiana and typical early-round matches of a minor tournament, a straight-sets win is plausible. However, th...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Mary Stoiana
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mary Stoiana
DeepSeek V3
Mary Stoiana
Claude Haiku 4.5
Mary Stoiana
Grok 4 Fast
Mary Stoiana
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a69f58412110b6fe…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 9 · 01:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38992,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Kia Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Jazmin Ortenzi",
"home": "Mary Stoiana"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.