Martyna KubkavsKristina Liutova
KLAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 2/10 models |
Martyna Kubka 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
54%
Over 2.5 |
58%
Martyna Kubka |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 2.5 US Open women's singles matches are best-of-3 sets. Given both players are lower-ranked, neither is a dominant serve-and-volley specialist;...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Martyna Kubka Both players are relatively lower-ranked WTA competitors with limited high-profile match data in my training knowledge (cutoff 2025-09). Kub... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Under 2.5 |
62%
Martyna Kubka |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 Lower-ranked qualifiers at US Open often produce straight-set results when one player holds any surface familiarity. Limited head-to-head hi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Martyna Kubka Martyna Kubka holds a modest edge in hard-court experience from prior seasons while Kristina Liutova remains largely untested at this level.... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Over 2.5 |
55%
Martyna Kubka |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Assuming both players are of similar caliber on the professional circuit, a match between them is likely to be competitive, extending to thr...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Martyna Kubka Given this match is in the distant future (2026), my predictions are based solely on general player profiles from my training data through e... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
over |
65%
Martyna Kubka |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given the slight uncertainty in player form and the potential for a closely contested match between players of similar caliber, there's a re...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Martyna Kubka Based on my training data, Martyna Kubka is the more established player with a better track record, suggesting she is the favorite in this m... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over_2.5 |
65%
Martyna Kubka |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 With both players capable of holding serve and a competitive match expected, going over 2.5 sets is likely. Kubka's strong serving should fo...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Martyna Kubka Training data through 2025-09. Martyna Kubka has shown more consistent performance on hard courts, with a stronger serve and better movement... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
US Open women's singles matches are best-of-3 sets. Given both players are lower-ranked, neither is a dominant serve-and-volley specialist;...
Lower-ranked qualifiers at US Open often produce straight-set results when one player holds any surface familiarity. Limited head-to-head hi...
Assuming both players are of similar caliber on the professional circuit, a match between them is likely to be competitive, extending to thr...
Given the slight uncertainty in player form and the potential for a closely contested match between players of similar caliber, there's a re...
With both players capable of holding serve and a competitive match expected, going over 2.5 sets is likely. Kubka's strong serving should fo...
Match winner
ConsensusMartyna Kubka 5/5
Both players are relatively lower-ranked WTA competitors with limited high-profile match data in my training knowledge (cutoff 2025-09). Kub...
Martyna Kubka holds a modest edge in hard-court experience from prior seasons while Kristina Liutova remains largely untested at this level....
Given this match is in the distant future (2026), my predictions are based solely on general player profiles from my training data through e...
Based on my training data, Martyna Kubka is the more established player with a better track record, suggesting she is the favorite in this m...
Training data through 2025-09. Martyna Kubka has shown more consistent performance on hard courts, with a stronger serve and better movement...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Martyna Kubka
DeepSeek V3
Martyna Kubka
Grok 4 Fast
Martyna Kubka
Claude Haiku 4.5
Martyna Kubka
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Martyna Kubka
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
46b3f14c2f997c71…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 28 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31705,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Kristina Liutova",
"home": "Martyna Kubka"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.