Marton FucsovicsvsRoman Safiullin
RSYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Marton Fucsovics 4/5 models |
Over 2.5 sets 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Marton Fucsovics |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Marton Fucsovics Fucsovics has a stronger ATP ranking history and more experience at ATP 250 level tournaments like Winston-Salem. Safiullin is a solid basel...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Both players are solid baseline-oriented competitors with moderate serve strength; neither is a dominating hard-court server. The match is l... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
Roman Safiullin |
62%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Roman Safiullin Training data through 2023 shows Safiullin with stronger recent hard-court results and serve metrics than Fucsovics. No head-to-head data av...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over_2.5 Both players historically push matches to three sets on hard courts when evenly matched. Training knowledge indicates low retirement risk bu... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
53%
Marton Fucsovics |
58%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Marton Fucsovics Based on training data through my last update, Marton Fucsovics typically demonstrates strong consistency and a solid all-around game on har...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 sets Given the likely competitive nature of this match between two capable hard-court players, a full three-set encounter is anticipated. Fucsovi... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
57%
Marton Fucsovics |
59%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
57%
Marton Fucsovics Based on training data, Marton Fucsovics has historically performed slightly better on hard courts and generally has a more consistent recor...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
59%
over The match is projected to be close, with Fucsovics having a slight edge. This suggests that Safiullin will likely put up a strong fight, pot... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Marton Fucsovics |
70%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Marton Fucsovics Based on training data through 2025, Fucsovics has shown more consistent form on hard courts, while Safiullin has struggled with consistency...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 2.5 sets The players are closely matched on this surface, and their past matches have often gone to three sets. Fucsovics' serve is not dominant enou... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMarton Fucsovics 4/5
Fucsovics has a stronger ATP ranking history and more experience at ATP 250 level tournaments like Winston-Salem. Safiullin is a solid basel...
Training data through 2023 shows Safiullin with stronger recent hard-court results and serve metrics than Fucsovics. No head-to-head data av...
Based on training data through my last update, Marton Fucsovics typically demonstrates strong consistency and a solid all-around game on har...
Based on training data, Marton Fucsovics has historically performed slightly better on hard courts and generally has a more consistent recor...
Based on training data through 2025, Fucsovics has shown more consistent form on hard courts, while Safiullin has struggled with consistency...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 sets 2/10
Both players are solid baseline-oriented competitors with moderate serve strength; neither is a dominating hard-court server. The match is l...
Both players historically push matches to three sets on hard courts when evenly matched. Training knowledge indicates low retirement risk bu...
Given the likely competitive nature of this match between two capable hard-court players, a full three-set encounter is anticipated. Fucsovi...
The match is projected to be close, with Fucsovics having a slight edge. This suggests that Safiullin will likely put up a strong fight, pot...
The players are closely matched on this surface, and their past matches have often gone to three sets. Fucsovics' serve is not dominant enou...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Marton Fucsovics
Claude Haiku 4.5
Marton Fucsovics
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Marton Fucsovics
Grok 4 Fast
Roman Safiullin
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Marton Fucsovics
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
21bb4a04023f251f…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29760,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Roman Safiullin",
"home": "Marton Fucsovics"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.