Marton FucsovicsvsDaniel Merida
DMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Marton Fucsovics 5/5 models |
under 3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Marton Fucsovics |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Marton Fucsovics Fucsovics is an established ATP player with consistent hard-court results and a ranking typically in the 50–80 range, while Merida is a lowe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Fucsovics typically engages in competitive baseline rallies and is not a dominant server who closes out matches quickly. While Merida's exac... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Marton Fucsovics |
68%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Marton Fucsovics Fucsovics is a veteran with multiple hard-court wins at Grand Slams while Merida is a junior-level player with no ATP experience on this sur...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
under 3.5 Fucsovics expected to win in straight sets given experience gap. Best-of-five matches between mismatched players rarely reach four sets. Tra... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Marton Fucsovics |
55%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Marton Fucsovics Based on my training data through early 2023, Marton Fucsovics is an established ATP player with significant Grand Slam experience and a con...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 Sets While Marton Fucsovics is the favorite, in a best-of-five Grand Slam format, an underdog often displays heightened motivation and fighting s... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
90%
Marton Fucsovics |
80%
Daniel Merida |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
90%
Marton Fucsovics Marton Fucsovics is significantly higher ranked and has a much more established career on the ATP Tour compared to Daniel Merida. Fucsovics...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
80%
Daniel Merida Given Marton Fucsovics's significant advantage in skill and ranking over Daniel Merida, it is highly probable that Fucsovics will win the ma...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Marton Fucsovics |
55%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Marton Fucsovics Based on training data through early 2025, Marton Fucsovics has significantly more tour-level experience and a higher career-high ranking th...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 3.5 Given the expected mismatch in experience and level, Fucsovics should win in straight sets or four sets at most. Merida may be competitive i... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMarton Fucsovics 5/5
Fucsovics is an established ATP player with consistent hard-court results and a ranking typically in the 50–80 range, while Merida is a lowe...
Fucsovics is a veteran with multiple hard-court wins at Grand Slams while Merida is a junior-level player with no ATP experience on this sur...
Based on my training data through early 2023, Marton Fucsovics is an established ATP player with significant Grand Slam experience and a con...
Marton Fucsovics is significantly higher ranked and has a much more established career on the ATP Tour compared to Daniel Merida. Fucsovics...
Based on training data through early 2025, Marton Fucsovics has significantly more tour-level experience and a higher career-high ranking th...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 3.5 1/10
Fucsovics typically engages in competitive baseline rallies and is not a dominant server who closes out matches quickly. While Merida's exac...
Fucsovics expected to win in straight sets given experience gap. Best-of-five matches between mismatched players rarely reach four sets. Tra...
While Marton Fucsovics is the favorite, in a best-of-five Grand Slam format, an underdog often displays heightened motivation and fighting s...
Given Marton Fucsovics's significant advantage in skill and ranking over Daniel Merida, it is highly probable that Fucsovics will win the ma...
Given the expected mismatch in experience and level, Fucsovics should win in straight sets or four sets at most. Merida may be competitive i...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Marton Fucsovics
Grok 4 Fast
Marton Fucsovics
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Marton Fucsovics
DeepSeek V3
Marton Fucsovics
Claude Haiku 4.5
Marton Fucsovics
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
0b9448bde30bd633…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 15:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31725,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Daniel Merida",
"home": "Marton Fucsovics"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.