Marina Bassols RiberavsMartyna Kubka
MKAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 2.5 3/10 models |
Marina Bassols Ribera 4/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Marina Bassols Ribiera |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are capable baseline competitors without dominant serving records that would suggest quick straight-set wins. While Marina is f...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Marina Bassols Ribiera Marina Bassols Ribiera is the higher-ranked player and has shown more consistent results on hard courts in recent years. Martyna Kubka is a... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
under |
62%
Marina Bassols Ribera |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
under Women's US Open matches are best of three. Stronger player typically closes in straight sets. Limited depth in Kubka's game suggests quick c...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Marina Bassols Ribera Bassols Ribera holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results than Kubka based on pre-2026 data. Head-to-head favors the Spaniard on o... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 |
58%
Marina Bassols Ribera |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Given the slight favoritism for Bassols Ribera but the competitive nature expected between these players, a straight-sets victory for either...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Marina Bassols Ribera Based on my training data through 2025-09, Marina Bassols Ribera generally has a stronger singles record on hard courts compared to Martyna... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Martyna Kubka |
55%
Marina Bassols Ribera |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Martyna Kubka Given Marina Bassols Ribera's slight advantage and the typical nature of Grand Slam matches, it's more probable that the match will be decid...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Marina Bassols Ribera Marina Bassols Ribera is the higher-ranked player and has demonstrated better recent form on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Op... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Over 2.5 |
60%
Marina Bassols Ribera |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both players have strong serves but are not the most dominant, leading to tight sets. In Grand Slam early rounds, matches often go to three...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Marina Bassols Ribera Bassols Ribera is a more seasoned clay-court player with higher ranking and better movement on hard courts, which is the surface of the US O... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 3/10
Both players are capable baseline competitors without dominant serving records that would suggest quick straight-set wins. While Marina is f...
Women's US Open matches are best of three. Stronger player typically closes in straight sets. Limited depth in Kubka's game suggests quick c...
Given the slight favoritism for Bassols Ribera but the competitive nature expected between these players, a straight-sets victory for either...
Given Marina Bassols Ribera's slight advantage and the typical nature of Grand Slam matches, it's more probable that the match will be decid...
Both players have strong serves but are not the most dominant, leading to tight sets. In Grand Slam early rounds, matches often go to three...
Match winner
ConsensusMarina Bassols Ribera 4/5
Marina Bassols Ribiera is the higher-ranked player and has shown more consistent results on hard courts in recent years. Martyna Kubka is a...
Bassols Ribera holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results than Kubka based on pre-2026 data. Head-to-head favors the Spaniard on o...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, Marina Bassols Ribera generally has a stronger singles record on hard courts compared to Martyna...
Marina Bassols Ribera is the higher-ranked player and has demonstrated better recent form on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Op...
Bassols Ribera is a more seasoned clay-court player with higher ranking and better movement on hard courts, which is the surface of the US O...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Marina Bassols Ribiera
Grok 4 Fast
Marina Bassols Ribera
DeepSeek V3
Marina Bassols Ribera
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Marina Bassols Ribera
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Marina Bassols Ribera
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
f0a8b165756f8e5d…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 21:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31169,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Martyna Kubka",
"home": "Marina Bassols Ribera"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.