Marina Bassols RiberavsEva Bennemann
EBYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Under 2.5 2/8 models |
Marina Bassols Ribera 4/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
under 22.5 |
72%
Marina Bassols Ribera |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under 22.5 A straight-sets victory by the home player projects to fewer total games on this surface. Bennemann's lower level implies fewer breaks and s...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Marina Bassols Ribera Marina Bassols Ribera is the higher-ranked and more experienced player on clay surfaces typical for this Spanish event. Eva Bennemann lacks... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
68%
Under 2.5 |
78%
Marina Bassols Ribera |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
Under 2.5 Given the perceived skill disparity between Marina Bassols Ribera and Eva Bennemann, a straight-sets victory for Bassols Ribera is the most...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Marina Bassols Ribera Based on historical data up to my last training update, Marina Bassols Ribera is a significantly more accomplished and higher-ranked player... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
over |
65%
Marina Bassols Ribera |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Given the projected match-up, there's a moderate likelihood of the match going to three sets. While Ribera is favored, Bennemann has the pot...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Marina Bassols Ribera Based on training data, Marina Bassols Ribera is a more established player with a higher perceived skill level than Eva Bennemann. Ribera is... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Under 2.5 |
88%
Marina Bassols Ribera |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 2.5 This is a training-data call, no live tools used. Bassols Ribera should be a clear favorite, and at this level of women's ITF/125k clay tenn...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
88%
Marina Bassols Ribera No live access used here, so this is from training data through 2025-09 plus general ranking knowledge. Bassols Ribera is a career clay-cour... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 2/8
A straight-sets victory by the home player projects to fewer total games on this surface. Bennemann's lower level implies fewer breaks and s...
Given the perceived skill disparity between Marina Bassols Ribera and Eva Bennemann, a straight-sets victory for Bassols Ribera is the most...
Given the projected match-up, there's a moderate likelihood of the match going to three sets. While Ribera is favored, Bennemann has the pot...
This is a training-data call, no live tools used. Bassols Ribera should be a clear favorite, and at this level of women's ITF/125k clay tenn...
Match winner
ConsensusMarina Bassols Ribera 4/4
Marina Bassols Ribera is the higher-ranked and more experienced player on clay surfaces typical for this Spanish event. Eva Bennemann lacks...
Based on historical data up to my last training update, Marina Bassols Ribera is a significantly more accomplished and higher-ranked player...
Based on training data, Marina Bassols Ribera is a more established player with a higher perceived skill level than Eva Bennemann. Ribera is...
No live access used here, so this is from training data through 2025-09 plus general ranking knowledge. Bassols Ribera is a career clay-cour...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Marina Bassols Ribera
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Marina Bassols Ribera
Grok 4 Fast
Marina Bassols Ribera
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Marina Bassols Ribera
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
400b56d1500ed963…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 14 · 16:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 43273,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "BBVA Open Internacional De Valencia",
"starts_at": "2026-09-14T16:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 14 Sep 2026 16:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Eva Bennemann",
"home": "Marina Bassols Ribera"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.