Marie BouzkovavsElsa Jacquemot
EJAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Marie Bouzkova 5/5 models |
Under 2.5 Sets 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Marie Bouzkova |
58%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Marie Bouzkova Marie Bouzkova is a more established WTA player with consistent hard-court performances and a higher ranking than Jacquemot as of my trainin...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 In early-round US Open women's matches between a favourite (Bouzkova) and a lower-ranked opponent (Jacquemot), straight-set wins (2–0) are t... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Marie Bouzkova |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Marie Bouzkova Bouzkova holds a clear ranking and experience edge on hard courts at a major. Jacquemot lacks the results against top-50 opponents to sugges...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Bouzkova's superior serve and return game on hard courts typically produces straight-set wins in first-round majors. Jacquemot has shown vul... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Marie Bouzkova |
60%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Marie Bouzkova Based on my training data up to my last update, Marie Bouzkova is the more established and higher-ranked player with a solid record on hard...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Marie Bouzkova's expected superiority and strong hard-court game, a straight-sets victory is highly probable. It will be challenging f... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Marie Bouzkova |
65%
Elsa Jacquemot |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Marie Bouzkova Marie Bouzkova is the higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA tour. While Elsa Jacquemot is a promising young talent, Bouzkova'...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Elsa Jacquemot Given Marie Bouzkova's favored status and experience, it is likely she will win this match in straight sets. While Elsa Jacquemot might push... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
70%
Marie Bouzkova |
60%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Marie Bouzkova Based on training data through 2025-09, Bouzkova has consistently higher WTA rankings and more experience on hard courts, while Jacquemot is...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 sets Given Bouzkova's inconsistency and Jacquemot's fighting spirit, a competitive three-set match is plausible. Both players have shown they can... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMarie Bouzkova 5/5
Marie Bouzkova is a more established WTA player with consistent hard-court performances and a higher ranking than Jacquemot as of my trainin...
Bouzkova holds a clear ranking and experience edge on hard courts at a major. Jacquemot lacks the results against top-50 opponents to sugges...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Marie Bouzkova is the more established and higher-ranked player with a solid record on hard...
Marie Bouzkova is the higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA tour. While Elsa Jacquemot is a promising young talent, Bouzkova'...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Bouzkova has consistently higher WTA rankings and more experience on hard courts, while Jacquemot is...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 Sets 1/10
In early-round US Open women's matches between a favourite (Bouzkova) and a lower-ranked opponent (Jacquemot), straight-set wins (2–0) are t...
Bouzkova's superior serve and return game on hard courts typically produces straight-set wins in first-round majors. Jacquemot has shown vul...
Given Marie Bouzkova's expected superiority and strong hard-court game, a straight-sets victory is highly probable. It will be challenging f...
Given Marie Bouzkova's favored status and experience, it is likely she will win this match in straight sets. While Elsa Jacquemot might push...
Given Bouzkova's inconsistency and Jacquemot's fighting spirit, a competitive three-set match is plausible. Both players have shown they can...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Marie Bouzkova
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Marie Bouzkova
DeepSeek V3
Marie Bouzkova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Marie Bouzkova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Marie Bouzkova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b698c5c32322be9d…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 15:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31774,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Elsa Jacquemot",
"home": "Marie Bouzkova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.