Mariam BolkvadzevsAlevtina Ibragimova
AIAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Mariam Bolkvadze 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Mariam Bolkvadze |
58%
Alevtina Ibragimova |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Mariam Bolkvadze Bolkvadze is the higher-ranked player (circa 100–150 WTA range) with superior hard-court form and consistency. Ibragimova, while a competent...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Alevtina Ibragimova Bolkvadze's hard-court dominance and serve quality suggest a relatively comfortable straight-sets victory in the likely early round context.... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Mariam Bolkvadze |
65%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Mariam Bolkvadze Mariam Bolkvadze holds a clear experience and ranking edge over Alevtina Ibragimova on hard courts. Training data through 2025 shows Bolkvad...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under_2.5 Bolkvadze favored to win in straight sets given experience gap. Women's US Open matches on hard often finish in two sets when one player dom... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Mariam Bolkvadze |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Mariam Bolkvadze Based on general career trajectory and experience in WTA events, Mariam Bolkvadze appears to be the more established player. While Ibragimov...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Despite Bolkvadze's slight edge, Ibragimova is likely to challenge, making a straight-sets victory for either player less certain. Grand Sla... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Mariam Bolkvadze |
62%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Mariam Bolkvadze Mariam Bolkvadze is the slightly favored player based on general tennis knowledge. She is expected to have a slight edge in consistency and...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over Given the slight edge for Bolkvadze, a three-set match is a distinct possibility. Both players are capable of winning sets, making an 'over'... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
61%
Mariam Bolkvadze |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
61%
Mariam Bolkvadze Based on training data through early 2025, Bolkvadze has a higher WTA ranking and more experience on hard courts, while Ibragimova has limit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 With both players likely having comparable levels at this stage, a three-set battle is plausible. Bolkvadze's edge may not be enough to domi... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMariam Bolkvadze 5/5
Bolkvadze is the higher-ranked player (circa 100–150 WTA range) with superior hard-court form and consistency. Ibragimova, while a competent...
Mariam Bolkvadze holds a clear experience and ranking edge over Alevtina Ibragimova on hard courts. Training data through 2025 shows Bolkvad...
Based on general career trajectory and experience in WTA events, Mariam Bolkvadze appears to be the more established player. While Ibragimov...
Mariam Bolkvadze is the slightly favored player based on general tennis knowledge. She is expected to have a slight edge in consistency and...
Based on training data through early 2025, Bolkvadze has a higher WTA ranking and more experience on hard courts, while Ibragimova has limit...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Bolkvadze's hard-court dominance and serve quality suggest a relatively comfortable straight-sets victory in the likely early round context....
Bolkvadze favored to win in straight sets given experience gap. Women's US Open matches on hard often finish in two sets when one player dom...
Despite Bolkvadze's slight edge, Ibragimova is likely to challenge, making a straight-sets victory for either player less certain. Grand Sla...
Given the slight edge for Bolkvadze, a three-set match is a distinct possibility. Both players are capable of winning sets, making an 'over'...
With both players likely having comparable levels at this stage, a three-set battle is plausible. Bolkvadze's edge may not be enough to domi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Mariam Bolkvadze
Claude Haiku 4.5
Mariam Bolkvadze
DeepSeek V3
Mariam Bolkvadze
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mariam Bolkvadze
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Mariam Bolkvadze
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
780d2d8333a652f4…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31126,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alevtina Ibragimova",
"home": "Mariam Bolkvadze"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.