Maria Lourdes CarlevsRositsa Dencheva
RDYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
2 2/10 models |
Maria Lourdes Carle 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 1.5 |
62%
Maria Lourdes Carle |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 Women's hard-court matches at the WTA 250 level are typically best-of-three sets, and competitive matchups between mid-ranked players often...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Maria Lourdes Carle Maria Lourdes Carle is an Argentine player with solid hard-court experience on the WTA circuit, while Rositsa Dencheva is a Bulgarian player... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
under 2.5 |
78%
Maria Lourdes Carle |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Carle's superior level should produce a straight-sets win on clay. Dencheva has shown limited ability to take sets from higher-ranked oppone...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Maria Lourdes Carle Maria Lourdes Carle holds a significantly higher ranking and stronger clay-court results than Rositsa Dencheva based on pre-2026 data. Carle... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
73%
Maria Lourdes Carle |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Carle's expected superior experience and consistency against a younger opponent, a straight-sets victory is the more probable outcome....
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
73%
Maria Lourdes Carle Based on training data up to my last update, Maria Lourdes Carle is an established professional player with more experience on the senior to... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Rositsa Dencheva |
65%
Maria Lourdes Carle |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Rositsa Dencheva Given the perceived difference in player strength between Maria Lourdes Carle and Rositsa Dencheva, a two-set match for Carle is the most pr...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Maria Lourdes Carle Based on training data, Maria Lourdes Carle is generally a stronger performer at this level than Rositsa Dencheva. Carle's experience and mo... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
52%
Rositsa Dencheva |
62%
Maria Lourdes Carle |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Rositsa Dencheva With Carle favored but Dencheva competitive, a straight-sets win is slightly more likely than a decider, but the gap is small. Both players...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Maria Lourdes Carle No live access; predicting from training knowledge through 2025-09. Carle is the more established WTA-level player with a solid clay-court b... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensus2 2/10
Women's hard-court matches at the WTA 250 level are typically best-of-three sets, and competitive matchups between mid-ranked players often...
Carle's superior level should produce a straight-sets win on clay. Dencheva has shown limited ability to take sets from higher-ranked oppone...
Given Carle's expected superior experience and consistency against a younger opponent, a straight-sets victory is the more probable outcome....
Given the perceived difference in player strength between Maria Lourdes Carle and Rositsa Dencheva, a two-set match for Carle is the most pr...
With Carle favored but Dencheva competitive, a straight-sets win is slightly more likely than a decider, but the gap is small. Both players...
Match winner
ConsensusMaria Lourdes Carle 5/5
Maria Lourdes Carle is an Argentine player with solid hard-court experience on the WTA circuit, while Rositsa Dencheva is a Bulgarian player...
Maria Lourdes Carle holds a significantly higher ranking and stronger clay-court results than Rositsa Dencheva based on pre-2026 data. Carle...
Based on training data up to my last update, Maria Lourdes Carle is an established professional player with more experience on the senior to...
Based on training data, Maria Lourdes Carle is generally a stronger performer at this level than Rositsa Dencheva. Carle's experience and mo...
No live access; predicting from training knowledge through 2025-09. Carle is the more established WTA-level player with a solid clay-court b...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Maria Lourdes Carle
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Maria Lourdes Carle
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Maria Lourdes Carle
Claude Haiku 4.5
Maria Lourdes Carle
DeepSeek V3
Maria Lourdes Carle
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a6568c62d2e0729a…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 11 · 11:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39981,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "ATIK Antalya Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-11T11:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Rositsa Dencheva",
"home": "Maria Lourdes Carle"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.