Marco CecchinatovsVilius Gaubas
VGAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 3.5 sets 2/10 models |
Marco Cecchinato 4/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Marco Cecchinato |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 US Open hard courts tend to produce longer rallies and closer matches, especially in opening rounds where seeding gaps may not guarantee qui...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Marco Cecchinato Cecchinato is an established ATP player with multiple Grand Slam appearances and clay-court pedigree, whereas Gaubas is a lower-ranked journ... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
over_2.5 |
58%
Marco Cecchinato |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
82%
over_2.5 Training data through 2025-09 indicates best-of-five US Open matches between unevenly matched players rarely finish in straight sets. Both p...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Marco Cecchinato Training data through 2025-09 shows Cecchinato with greater Grand Slam experience on hard courts despite his clay-court preference. Gaubas r... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Over 3.5 sets |
75%
Vilius Gaubas |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 sets While Vilius Gaubas is favored to win, Marco Cecchinato's Grand Slam experience could allow him to challenge and potentially win at least on...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Vilius Gaubas Marco Cecchinato is primarily a clay-court specialist, and his performance significantly diminishes on hard courts. By 2026, he will be an a... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Vilius Gaubas |
65%
Marco Cecchinato |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Vilius Gaubas Given Cecchinato's higher likelihood of winning and Gaubas's potential to put up a fight as an emerging player, a two-set victory for Cecchi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Marco Cecchinato Marco Cecchinato is the more experienced player with a significantly higher career ranking and a proven track record on hard courts, which i... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Over 3.5 sets |
55%
Marco Cecchinato |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 sets Given the competitive nature of the matchup and the lack of dominance from either player on hard courts, a lengthy match is likely. Cecchina...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Marco Cecchinato Training data through 2025-09. Cecchinato is an experienced clay-court specialist with a higher peak ranking and more tour-level matches, bu... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 3.5 sets 2/10
US Open hard courts tend to produce longer rallies and closer matches, especially in opening rounds where seeding gaps may not guarantee qui...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates best-of-five US Open matches between unevenly matched players rarely finish in straight sets. Both p...
While Vilius Gaubas is favored to win, Marco Cecchinato's Grand Slam experience could allow him to challenge and potentially win at least on...
Given Cecchinato's higher likelihood of winning and Gaubas's potential to put up a fight as an emerging player, a two-set victory for Cecchi...
Given the competitive nature of the matchup and the lack of dominance from either player on hard courts, a lengthy match is likely. Cecchina...
Match winner
ConsensusMarco Cecchinato 4/5
Cecchinato is an established ATP player with multiple Grand Slam appearances and clay-court pedigree, whereas Gaubas is a lower-ranked journ...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Cecchinato with greater Grand Slam experience on hard courts despite his clay-court preference. Gaubas r...
Marco Cecchinato is primarily a clay-court specialist, and his performance significantly diminishes on hard courts. By 2026, he will be an a...
Marco Cecchinato is the more experienced player with a significantly higher career ranking and a proven track record on hard courts, which i...
Training data through 2025-09. Cecchinato is an experienced clay-court specialist with a higher peak ranking and more tour-level matches, bu...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Vilius Gaubas
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Marco Cecchinato
Claude Haiku 4.5
Marco Cecchinato
Grok 4 Fast
Marco Cecchinato
DeepSeek V3
Marco Cecchinato
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
abc6554ba045ba29…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 16:35 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31115,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Vilius Gaubas",
"home": "Marco Cecchinato"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.