Marc PolmansvsSebastian Gorzny
SGYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Marc Polmans 5/5 models |
under_2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Marc Polmans |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Marc Polmans Marc Polmans is an established ATP-level player with multiple tour-level appearances and a solid hard-court record, whereas Sebastian Gorzny...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Winston-Salem Open is a best-of-3 set match on hard court. Polmans' superior ranking and experience suggest he is favored, but Gorzny's chal... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Marc Polmans |
55%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Marc Polmans Training data through 2023 shows Marc Polmans with superior experience and ranking compared to Sebastian Gorzny. Hard-court surface in Winst...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 2.5 Training data through 2023 indicates both players capable of competitive sets on hard courts. Limited head-to-head suggests potential for th... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Marc Polmans |
60%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Marc Polmans Based on my training data up to my last update, Marc Polmans is the significantly more experienced player with a stronger track record on ha...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under_2.5 Marc Polmans is expected to be significantly more dominant than Sebastian Gorzny on hard courts at an ATP 250 event. Given Polmans' experien... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Marc Polmans |
65%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Marc Polmans Marc Polmans is the more experienced player on the ATP tour, with a higher career-high ranking and more consistent results on hard courts, w...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.5 Given Polmans' experience and Gorzny's developing game, this match is likely to be competitive but ultimately lean towards Polmans winning i... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Marc Polmans |
55%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Marc Polmans Based on training data through 2025-09, Marc Polmans has more ATP tour experience and a higher career-high ranking than Sebastian Gorzny, wh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_2.5 Both players are not top-tier and matches in early rounds often go to straight sets when the better player controls the match. Polmans is ex... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMarc Polmans 5/5
Marc Polmans is an established ATP-level player with multiple tour-level appearances and a solid hard-court record, whereas Sebastian Gorzny...
Training data through 2023 shows Marc Polmans with superior experience and ranking compared to Sebastian Gorzny. Hard-court surface in Winst...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Marc Polmans is the significantly more experienced player with a stronger track record on ha...
Marc Polmans is the more experienced player on the ATP tour, with a higher career-high ranking and more consistent results on hard courts, w...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Marc Polmans has more ATP tour experience and a higher career-high ranking than Sebastian Gorzny, wh...
Over / Under
Consensusunder_2.5 2/10
Winston-Salem Open is a best-of-3 set match on hard court. Polmans' superior ranking and experience suggest he is favored, but Gorzny's chal...
Training data through 2023 indicates both players capable of competitive sets on hard courts. Limited head-to-head suggests potential for th...
Marc Polmans is expected to be significantly more dominant than Sebastian Gorzny on hard courts at an ATP 250 event. Given Polmans' experien...
Given Polmans' experience and Gorzny's developing game, this match is likely to be competitive but ultimately lean towards Polmans winning i...
Both players are not top-tier and matches in early rounds often go to straight sets when the better player controls the match. Polmans is ex...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Marc Polmans
Claude Haiku 4.5
Marc Polmans
Grok 4 Fast
Marc Polmans
DeepSeek V3
Marc Polmans
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Marc Polmans
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
ec3f53f7009fac20…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 16:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29755,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T16:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 16:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Sebastian Gorzny",
"home": "Marc Polmans"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.