Mackenzie McDonaldvsStefano Napolitano
SNYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Mackenzie McDonald 5/5 models |
over 3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Mackenzie McDonald |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Mackenzie McDonald McDonald is a recognized US hard-court player with ATP ranking in the 100s and regular US Open appearances; Napolitano is an Italian journey...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 McDonald is a competent player who should win, but Napolitano's serve and baseline consistency may allow him to take at least one set, exten... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Mackenzie McDonald |
55%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Mackenzie McDonald Mackenzie McDonald holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results from training data through 2025. Stefano Napolitano has limited su...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 3.5 US Open main-draw matches are best-of-five. McDonald typically pushes sets longer against lower-ranked opponents. Napolitano's return game c... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Mackenzie McDonald |
65%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Mackenzie McDonald Mackenzie McDonald is a seasoned hard-court player with significant Grand Slam experience, particularly at the US Open, which favors his con...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 3.5 Sets While McDonald is favored, Napolitano possesses a serve capable of winning a set, preventing a straightforward 3-0 sweep. The best-of-5 form... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Mackenzie McDonald |
58%
Stefano Napolitano |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Mackenzie McDonald Mackenzie McDonald is the favorite due to his higher ranking and experience on the ATP tour, particularly on hard courts. While Napolitano h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Stefano Napolitano Given McDonald's slight edge and the potential for a competitive match, it's probable that this will go to two sets. While a three-set match... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Mackenzie McDonald |
55%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Mackenzie McDonald Based on training data through 2025-09, McDonald has consistently performed better on hard courts, with a higher ranking and more experience...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_3.5 In best-of-five matches at the US Open, lower-ranked qualifiers often push higher-ranked players to four or five sets, especially when the f... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMackenzie McDonald 5/5
McDonald is a recognized US hard-court player with ATP ranking in the 100s and regular US Open appearances; Napolitano is an Italian journey...
Mackenzie McDonald holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results from training data through 2025. Stefano Napolitano has limited su...
Mackenzie McDonald is a seasoned hard-court player with significant Grand Slam experience, particularly at the US Open, which favors his con...
Mackenzie McDonald is the favorite due to his higher ranking and experience on the ATP tour, particularly on hard courts. While Napolitano h...
Based on training data through 2025-09, McDonald has consistently performed better on hard courts, with a higher ranking and more experience...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3.5 1/10
McDonald is a competent player who should win, but Napolitano's serve and baseline consistency may allow him to take at least one set, exten...
US Open main-draw matches are best-of-five. McDonald typically pushes sets longer against lower-ranked opponents. Napolitano's return game c...
While McDonald is favored, Napolitano possesses a serve capable of winning a set, preventing a straightforward 3-0 sweep. The best-of-5 form...
Given McDonald's slight edge and the potential for a competitive match, it's probable that this will go to two sets. While a three-set match...
In best-of-five matches at the US Open, lower-ranked qualifiers often push higher-ranked players to four or five sets, especially when the f...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Mackenzie McDonald
Claude Haiku 4.5
Mackenzie McDonald
Grok 4 Fast
Mackenzie McDonald
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Mackenzie McDonald
DeepSeek V3
Mackenzie McDonald
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
8b5ae7e13189aad1…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 19:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30774,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Stefano Napolitano",
"home": "Mackenzie McDonald"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.