Ma YeXinvsClara Burel
CBYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Clara Burel 3/5 models |
over_2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Ma YeXin |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Ma YeXin Ma YeXin is a Chinese player with a strong hard-court game and solid ranking trajectory as of my training knowledge (through September 2025)...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are mid-to-upper tier professionals capable of extended rallies and break-point contests on hard courts. Ma YeXin's consistent... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Clara Burel |
52%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Clara Burel Training data through 2025-09 shows Clara Burel with stronger hard-court results and recent form against similar opposition compared to Ma Y...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over_2.5 Training data through 2025-09 indicates both players often push matches to three sets on hard courts when evenly matched. Burel's experience... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Clara Burel |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Clara Burel Based on training data through September 2025, Clara Burel is a significantly more experienced and higher-ranked player compared to Ma YeXin...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Clara Burel's significant edge in experience and ranking on hard courts, a dominant performance leading to a straight-sets victory (2-... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Clara Burel |
60%
Clara Burel |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Clara Burel Based on general knowledge of tennis players, Clara Burel is a more established player with a higher career ranking and more significant win...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Clara Burel Given Clara Burel is the favored player and this is likely a best-of-three sets match at the US Open, Burel is expected to win in two sets.... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Ma YeXin |
55%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Ma YeXin Training data through 2025-09: Ma YeXin has shown strong form on hard courts, with a solid serve and aggressive baseline play. Clara Burel i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Both players have shown tendency to win matches in straight sets in recent tournaments, with Ma YeXin's aggressive play and Burel's occasion... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusClara Burel 3/5
Ma YeXin is a Chinese player with a strong hard-court game and solid ranking trajectory as of my training knowledge (through September 2025)...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Clara Burel with stronger hard-court results and recent form against similar opposition compared to Ma Y...
Based on training data through September 2025, Clara Burel is a significantly more experienced and higher-ranked player compared to Ma YeXin...
Based on general knowledge of tennis players, Clara Burel is a more established player with a higher career ranking and more significant win...
Training data through 2025-09: Ma YeXin has shown strong form on hard courts, with a solid serve and aggressive baseline play. Clara Burel i...
Over / Under
Consensusover_2.5 1/10
Both players are mid-to-upper tier professionals capable of extended rallies and break-point contests on hard courts. Ma YeXin's consistent...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates both players often push matches to three sets on hard courts when evenly matched. Burel's experience...
Given Clara Burel's significant edge in experience and ranking on hard courts, a dominant performance leading to a straight-sets victory (2-...
Given Clara Burel is the favored player and this is likely a best-of-three sets match at the US Open, Burel is expected to win in two sets....
Both players have shown tendency to win matches in straight sets in recent tournaments, with Ma YeXin's aggressive play and Burel's occasion...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Clara Burel
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Clara Burel
Claude Haiku 4.5
Ma YeXin
Grok 4 Fast
Clara Burel
DeepSeek V3
Ma YeXin
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d2968b546ba6b257…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 15:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30807,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Clara Burel",
"home": "Ma YeXin"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.