Lucrezia StefaninivsJulieta Pareja
JPAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Lucrezia Stefanini 4/5 models |
under_2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Julieta Pareja |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Julieta Pareja Both players are relatively low-ranked and this appears to be an early-round US Open match. Based on training knowledge through 2025, Pareja...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Both players are qualifiers or lower seeds with comparable baseline skills and limited hard-court pedigree at this level. Matches between cl... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Lucrezia Stefanini |
58%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Lucrezia Stefanini Training data through 2023 shows Stefanini with established pro experience and better hard-court results than the younger Pareja. No recent...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under_2.5 Training data through 2023 indicates Stefanini often closes matches in straight sets on hard courts against lower-ranked opponents. Best-of-... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Lucrezia Stefanini |
55%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Lucrezia Stefanini Based on general tennis knowledge from my training data through 2025-09, Lucrezia Stefanini is a more established professional player with g...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Stefanini is the more established player and is likely to be the favorite, a straight-sets victory is a common outcome in the early ro... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Lucrezia Stefanini |
65%
Julieta Pareja |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Lucrezia Stefanini Lucrezia Stefanini is a more established player with a better record on hard courts compared to Julieta Pareja, who has historically struggl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Julieta Pareja Given Lucrezia Stefanini's advantage on hard courts and her superior form, it's likely she will win this match in straight sets. Julieta Par... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Lucrezia Stefanini |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Lucrezia Stefanini Based on training data through 2025-09, Stefanini has superior ranking and experience on hard courts compared to Pareja, who is relatively u...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Both players have shown competitive tenacity in their recent matches, and with Pareja's underdog status, she is likely to push at least one... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLucrezia Stefanini 4/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked and this appears to be an early-round US Open match. Based on training knowledge through 2025, Pareja...
Training data through 2023 shows Stefanini with established pro experience and better hard-court results than the younger Pareja. No recent...
Based on general tennis knowledge from my training data through 2025-09, Lucrezia Stefanini is a more established professional player with g...
Lucrezia Stefanini is a more established player with a better record on hard courts compared to Julieta Pareja, who has historically struggl...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Stefanini has superior ranking and experience on hard courts compared to Pareja, who is relatively u...
Over / Under
Consensusunder_2.5 1/10
Both players are qualifiers or lower seeds with comparable baseline skills and limited hard-court pedigree at this level. Matches between cl...
Training data through 2023 indicates Stefanini often closes matches in straight sets on hard courts against lower-ranked opponents. Best-of-...
Given Stefanini is the more established player and is likely to be the favorite, a straight-sets victory is a common outcome in the early ro...
Given Lucrezia Stefanini's advantage on hard courts and her superior form, it's likely she will win this match in straight sets. Julieta Par...
Both players have shown competitive tenacity in their recent matches, and with Pareja's underdog status, she is likely to push at least one...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Lucrezia Stefanini
Grok 4 Fast
Lucrezia Stefanini
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Lucrezia Stefanini
Claude Haiku 4.5
Julieta Pareja
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Lucrezia Stefanini
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a0fa958f37c7d348…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 15:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31677,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Julieta Pareja",
"home": "Lucrezia Stefanini"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.