Luciano DarderivsAlexander Zverev
AZAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alexander Zverev 5/5 models |
under 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Alexander Zverev |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Alexander Zverev Zverev is a top-10 player with superior hard-court credentials and a history of deep US Open runs, while Darderi is an emerging talent ranke...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Zverev's superior ranking, serve, and hard-court mastery suggest a relatively dominant performance rather than a competitive five-setter. Wh... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
88%
Alexander Zverev |
72%
under_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
88%
Alexander Zverev Zverev is a top-5 player with multiple hard-court titles while Darderi is a clay-court specialist ranked outside the top 30. Training data t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
72%
under_3.5 Zverev routinely dispatches lower-tier players in straight sets on hard courts. Darderi has shown limited success converting break points ag... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
85%
Alexander Zverev |
70%
Under 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Alexander Zverev Based on my training data up to my last update, Alexander Zverev is a top-tier player, particularly strong on hard courts, with significant...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Under 3.5 Sets Given the significant disparity in hard-court prowess between Zverev and Darderi, a swift victory for Zverev is highly probable. While Darde... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
85%
Alexander Zverev |
65%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Alexander Zverev Alexander Zverev is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player on the ATP tour, especially in Grand Slam events like the US O...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under Given Zverev's expected dominance and the potential for him to win in straight sets, the 'under' on the total sets seems more probable. Whil... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
85%
Alexander Zverev |
70%
under_3.5_sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Alexander Zverev Zverev is a top-5 player with consistent hard-court results, including deep runs at the US Open, while Darderi is primarily a clay-court spe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
under_3.5_sets Zverev's serving and consistent baseline game should allow him to win in straight sets or four sets maximum, especially against an overmatch... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlexander Zverev 5/5
Zverev is a top-10 player with superior hard-court credentials and a history of deep US Open runs, while Darderi is an emerging talent ranke...
Zverev is a top-5 player with multiple hard-court titles while Darderi is a clay-court specialist ranked outside the top 30. Training data t...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Alexander Zverev is a top-tier player, particularly strong on hard courts, with significant...
Alexander Zverev is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player on the ATP tour, especially in Grand Slam events like the US O...
Zverev is a top-5 player with consistent hard-court results, including deep runs at the US Open, while Darderi is primarily a clay-court spe...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
Zverev's superior ranking, serve, and hard-court mastery suggest a relatively dominant performance rather than a competitive five-setter. Wh...
Zverev routinely dispatches lower-tier players in straight sets on hard courts. Darderi has shown limited success converting break points ag...
Given the significant disparity in hard-court prowess between Zverev and Darderi, a swift victory for Zverev is highly probable. While Darde...
Given Zverev's expected dominance and the potential for him to win in straight sets, the 'under' on the total sets seems more probable. Whil...
Zverev's serving and consistent baseline game should allow him to win in straight sets or four sets maximum, especially against an overmatch...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Alexander Zverev
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alexander Zverev
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alexander Zverev
DeepSeek V3
Alexander Zverev
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alexander Zverev
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
360047ebdbd79889…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 01:15 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38960,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alexander Zverev",
"home": "Luciano Darderi"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.