Lucciana Perez AlarconvsTian Fangran
TFYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Tian Fangran 3/5 models |
over 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Tian Fangran |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Tian Fangran Tian Fangran is a rising Chinese player with stronger recent WTA form and a more consistent baseline game on hard courts typical of North Am...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are mid-ranked WTA competitors with defensive capabilities and mental toughness typical of extended baseline rallies on hard co... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Tian Fangran |
53%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Tian Fangran Tian Fangran holds the stronger recent form on hard courts from training data through 2025-09. Lucciana Perez Alarcon lacks consistent resul...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Both players show limited experience closing matches quickly on outdoor hard. Expect competitive sets with break-point battles extending the... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Tian Fangran |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Tian Fangran Based on general player profiles from training data up to my last update, Tian Fangran typically performs more consistently on hard courts,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets Despite Tian Fangran being a slight favorite, Lucciana Perez Alarcon is a resilient player capable of taking a set, especially if she adjust... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
70%
Lucciana Perez Alarcon |
65%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Lucciana Perez Alarcon Lucciana Perez Alarcon is a more established player on the WTA tour with a higher career ranking and more consistent performance on hard cou...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.5 Given Perez Alarcon's higher ranking and more consistent play, she is expected to win in straight sets. However, Fangran is capable of takin...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Lucciana Perez Alarcon |
75%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Lucciana Perez Alarcon Training data through 2025-09. Perez Alarcon has shown consistent form on hard courts and a more aggressive baseline game, which suits the o...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Over 1.5 Given the competitive nature of the matchup and both players' ability to win sets on hard courts, a straight-sets win is less likely. Perez... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusTian Fangran 3/5
Tian Fangran is a rising Chinese player with stronger recent WTA form and a more consistent baseline game on hard courts typical of North Am...
Tian Fangran holds the stronger recent form on hard courts from training data through 2025-09. Lucciana Perez Alarcon lacks consistent resul...
Based on general player profiles from training data up to my last update, Tian Fangran typically performs more consistently on hard courts,...
Lucciana Perez Alarcon is a more established player on the WTA tour with a higher career ranking and more consistent performance on hard cou...
Training data through 2025-09. Perez Alarcon has shown consistent form on hard courts and a more aggressive baseline game, which suits the o...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/10
Both players are mid-ranked WTA competitors with defensive capabilities and mental toughness typical of extended baseline rallies on hard co...
Both players show limited experience closing matches quickly on outdoor hard. Expect competitive sets with break-point battles extending the...
Despite Tian Fangran being a slight favorite, Lucciana Perez Alarcon is a resilient player capable of taking a set, especially if she adjust...
Given Perez Alarcon's higher ranking and more consistent play, she is expected to win in straight sets. However, Fangran is capable of takin...
Given the competitive nature of the matchup and both players' ability to win sets on hard courts, a straight-sets win is less likely. Perez...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Lucciana Perez Alarcon
Claude Haiku 4.5
Tian Fangran
DeepSeek V3
Lucciana Perez Alarcon
Grok 4 Fast
Tian Fangran
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tian Fangran
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
83119ace1c53cd49…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30548,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Tian Fangran",
"home": "Lucciana Perez Alarcon"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.