Luca PowvsFelix Balshaw
FBYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Luca Pow 5/5 models |
over 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Luca Pow |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Luca Pow Both players are relatively obscure on the ATP tour, with limited public record available in training data through 2025-09. Luca Pow is slig...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 ATP 250 matches on hard court typically produce competitive sets, especially early-round encounters where seeding gaps are moderate. Without... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Luca Pow |
58%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Luca Pow Luca Pow is listed as the home player on hard courts at Winston-Salem; with no public recent form or h2h data available for either low-ranke...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Best-of-3 format on outdoor hard favors longer matches when both players lack dominant serve data. Training knowledge indicates similar-leve... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Luca Pow |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Luca Pow With no live data available for this future match in 2026, the prediction relies solely on general knowledge from training data through 2025...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Given the assumption of a close H2H match between two developing players with no clear form indicators, a three-set encounter is highly prob... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Luca Pow |
65%
Felix Balshaw |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Luca Pow Based on training data, Luca Pow is generally a stronger player on hard courts and has shown more consistent performance in recent tournamen...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Felix Balshaw Given Luca Pow's slight advantage and the potential for a close match, it's probable that this encounter will go to the full duration. Pow's... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Luca Pow |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Luca Pow Based on training data through 2025-09, Luca Pow has shown stronger results on hard courts and a higher overall ceiling, while Felix Balshaw...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Both players are relatively evenly matched, which often leads to competitive three-set matches on hard courts. Given the lack of a dominant... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLuca Pow 5/5
Both players are relatively obscure on the ATP tour, with limited public record available in training data through 2025-09. Luca Pow is slig...
Luca Pow is listed as the home player on hard courts at Winston-Salem; with no public recent form or h2h data available for either low-ranke...
With no live data available for this future match in 2026, the prediction relies solely on general knowledge from training data through 2025...
Based on training data, Luca Pow is generally a stronger player on hard courts and has shown more consistent performance in recent tournamen...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Luca Pow has shown stronger results on hard courts and a higher overall ceiling, while Felix Balshaw...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/10
ATP 250 matches on hard court typically produce competitive sets, especially early-round encounters where seeding gaps are moderate. Without...
Best-of-3 format on outdoor hard favors longer matches when both players lack dominant serve data. Training knowledge indicates similar-leve...
Given the assumption of a close H2H match between two developing players with no clear form indicators, a three-set encounter is highly prob...
Given Luca Pow's slight advantage and the potential for a close match, it's probable that this encounter will go to the full duration. Pow's...
Both players are relatively evenly matched, which often leads to competitive three-set matches on hard courts. Given the lack of a dominant...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Luca Pow
Claude Haiku 4.5
Luca Pow
DeepSeek V3
Luca Pow
Grok 4 Fast
Luca Pow
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Luca Pow
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
ab6291e29ea26e5b…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 15:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29751,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Felix Balshaw",
"home": "Luca Pow"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.