Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Angel Stadium
Upcoming · in 90h 32m
Los Angeles Angels logo

Los Angeles AngelsvsTexas Rangers

Texas Rangers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Texas Rangers 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Los Angeles Angels

The Angels have won the last two head-to-head meetings decisively, including a dominant 13–1 victory on 2026-07-09. Despite poor recent form...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% Texas Rangers

With probable starters not yet posted, I lean to the Rangers straight-up based on roster balance and slightly stronger run production trends...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Texas Rangers

The Texas Rangers have a slightly better overall record and have shown more consistent performance in recent games compared to the Los Angel...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Los Angeles Angels

Angels are at home despite poor recent form of WLLLL. Rangers form is slightly better but both teams show high scoring conceded. Training da...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Los Angeles Angels

Based on general baseball knowledge and the provided data through 2026-07. The Angels hold home-field advantage and recently dominated the R...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Texas Rangers

The Texas Rangers have a slightly better recent form and a more favorable starting pitcher matchup. Jon Gray, despite recent struggles, has...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Texas Rangers

Based on training data through 2025-09, the Rangers have been a stronger team than the Angels in recent seasons, with better overall roster...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Over 8.5

Both teams combined for 46 runs across their last 5 matches (Angels 24, Rangers 22), averaging 9.2 runs per game. The recent head-to-head ma...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% under

Angel Stadium typically plays as a neutral-to-pitcher-friendly park and the August evening forecast shows light SSW winds (not a strong 'win...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, and the game is expected to be competitive, potentially leading to a higher total sco...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Both teams conceding high runs in last 5 games each. Angel Stadium tends to play neutral to hitter friendly. Training data through 2025-09 i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% Over 8.5

Both teams have shown a tendency for higher-scoring games recently, with their last five games averaging over 4 runs scored per team and nea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede runs recently. The Angels' home park is generally hitter-friendly, and the projected s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 9.0

Both teams have shown moderate scoring recently, with the Rangers averaging 4.4 runs per game and the Angels 4.8 over their last five. Angel...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Texas Rangers 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Los Angeles Angels -1

The Angels' 13–1 victory in the most recent matchup demonstrates clear offensive dominance and suggests a talent or matchup edge. Texas has...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Los Angeles Angels +1.5

Given uncertainty around starters and the park's dampening effect on run totals, the safer spread play is the Angels +1.5 (home +1.5) — it c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Texas Rangers

Given the Rangers' slightly better overall performance and away record, they are expected to cover the -1 spread, indicating a win by at lea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% home_ -1.5

Home team gets run line edge at own park despite form. Training data through 2025-09 shows Angels cover run line more often vs Rangers in re...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Los Angeles Angels -1.5

Given the Angels are picked to win at home, and their recent 13-1 victory against the Rangers demonstrates their capability to win by a sign...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Texas Rangers

Given the slight edge in starting pitching and recent form, the Rangers are slightly favored to cover a standard spread. The Angels have str...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 45% Texas Rangers -1.5

The Rangers are the better team and should win, but covering a 1.5-run spread in baseball is risky since many games are decided by a single...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Los Angeles Angels 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Over 4.5

The 13–1 Angels victory on 2026-07-09 and 8–3 Rangers win on 2026-07-08 both reflect explosive early offensive output. Typically, early inni...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 50% Los Angeles Angels

With starting pitchers not yet announced, I favor the Angels to be leading after five innings by a small margin because home starters (and h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Texas Rangers

The Rangers' consistent performance and slightly better overall record suggest they may lead after the first five innings, though the game i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Los Angeles Angels

First five often mirrors full game home advantage. Training data through 2025-09 favors home teams early in interleague style games. Equal r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 38% Los Angeles Angels

Predicting the first five innings is challenging without starting pitcher information. However, assuming an average pitcher matchup, the hom...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Texas Rangers

The Rangers' starting pitcher, Jon Gray, despite recent struggles, is expected to perform adequately against the Angels' lineup in the early...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% Texas Rangers

The Rangers' starting pitching is generally stronger than the Angels' based on training data, and they have a slight edge in early-game perf...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Texas Rangers

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Texas Rangers

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Los Angeles Angels

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Texas Rangers

56
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Texas Rangers

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Los Angeles Angels

54
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Los Angeles Angels

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 4485737b197b3048…
Kickoff
Thu, Aug 13 · 02:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 24006,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Angel Stadium",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-13T02:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Thu, 13 Aug 2026 02:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Texas Rangers",
        "home": "Los Angeles Angels"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LWLLW",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 22,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 29
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WLLLL",
            "record": "1W-0D-4L",
            "scored": 24,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 29
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 35,
            "home": 35
        },
        "head_to_head": {
            "recent": [
                "2026-07-09: Texas Rangers 1–13 Los Angeles Angels",
                "2026-07-08: Texas Rangers 8–3 Los Angeles Angels"
            ],
            "matches": 2
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →