Lorenzo SonegovsAdrian Mannarino
AMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Lorenzo Sonego 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Lorenzo Sonego |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Lorenzo Sonego Lorenzo Sonego has historically performed better on hard courts in North America and holds a slight edge in career head-to-head matchups. Ma...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Neither player is a dominant force that typically steamrolls opponents in straight sets at this level. Both Sonego and Mannarino are capable... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Lorenzo Sonego |
57%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Lorenzo Sonego Training data through 2025-09. Sonego holds the edge on hard courts with stronger serve metrics and recent results against left-handers. Man...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
under_2.5 Training data through 2025-09. Both players average under 2.6 sets per hard-court match in 2025. Sonego's serve efficiency typically shorten... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Adrian Mannarino |
65%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Adrian Mannarino Adrian Mannarino's flat, unconventional game and strong record on hard courts make him a challenging opponent for Sonego. While Sonego posse...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 sets This match features two players with distinct styles who often engage in close contests. Mannarino's unique game can frustrate opponents, wh... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Adrian Mannarino |
65%
Adrian Mannarino |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Adrian Mannarino Adrian Mannarino holds a significant head-to-head advantage over Lorenzo Sonego, having won their previous three encounters. Mannarino's exp...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Adrian Mannarino Given Mannarino's head-to-head advantage and his slightly more consistent form on hard courts, it's likely he will win in straight sets. Whi... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Lorenzo Sonego |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Lorenzo Sonego Training data through 2025-09: Sonego has a slightly higher ceiling on hard courts and has been more consistent in 2025, while Mannarino's a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Given the competitive nature and their similar recent form, a three-set match is more likely. Both players have shown resilience in close ma... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLorenzo Sonego 3/5
Lorenzo Sonego has historically performed better on hard courts in North America and holds a slight edge in career head-to-head matchups. Ma...
Training data through 2025-09. Sonego holds the edge on hard courts with stronger serve metrics and recent results against left-handers. Man...
Adrian Mannarino's flat, unconventional game and strong record on hard courts make him a challenging opponent for Sonego. While Sonego posse...
Adrian Mannarino holds a significant head-to-head advantage over Lorenzo Sonego, having won their previous three encounters. Mannarino's exp...
Training data through 2025-09: Sonego has a slightly higher ceiling on hard courts and has been more consistent in 2025, while Mannarino's a...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Neither player is a dominant force that typically steamrolls opponents in straight sets at this level. Both Sonego and Mannarino are capable...
Training data through 2025-09. Both players average under 2.6 sets per hard-court match in 2025. Sonego's serve efficiency typically shorten...
This match features two players with distinct styles who often engage in close contests. Mannarino's unique game can frustrate opponents, wh...
Given Mannarino's head-to-head advantage and his slightly more consistent form on hard courts, it's likely he will win in straight sets. Whi...
Given the competitive nature and their similar recent form, a three-set match is more likely. Both players have shown resilience in close ma...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Lorenzo Sonego
Grok 4 Fast
Lorenzo Sonego
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Adrian Mannarino
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Adrian Mannarino
DeepSeek V3
Lorenzo Sonego
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
af64dbaf549eb28d…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 00:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31101,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-25T22:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 25 Aug 2026 22:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Adrian Mannarino",
"home": "Lorenzo Sonego"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.