Lola RadivojevicvsKristina Liutova
KLAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 2/10 models |
Lola Radivojevic 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Lola Radivojevic |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 At the US Open (best-of-3 for women's singles), totals_sets most likely refers to whether the match goes the distance. Radivojevic's hard-co...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Lola Radivojevic This prediction is based on training knowledge through early 2025; no live data is available for August 2026 form or seeding. Radivojevic ha... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
under 2.5 |
62%
Lola Radivojevic |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under 2.5 Radivojevic favored to close in straight sets on home-surface hard courts. Limited stamina data for Liutova in best-of-three format supports...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Lola Radivojevic Lola Radivojevic holds the edge on hard courts from known results in training data through 2025-09. Kristina Liutova lacks comparable senior... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 |
56%
Lola Radivojevic |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Given that both players, according to training data, exhibit competitive qualities and neither has an overwhelmingly dominant record, a clos...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
56%
Lola Radivojevic Based on my training data, Lola Radivojevic has demonstrated a slightly more consistent performance record on hard courts compared to Kristi... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
over |
62%
Lola Radivojevic |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Given the uncertainty in head-to-head performance, a match going to a deciding set is plausible. This prediction leans towards the 'over' gi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Lola Radivojevic Based on general knowledge of tennis player performance trends, Lola Radivojevic is a slightly favored player. Without specific recent match... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Over 20.5 |
62%
Lola Radivojevic |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 20.5 Close matchups on hard courts often produce many games, especially if sets go to tiebreaks. Radivojevic's strong serve and Liutova's resilie...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Lola Radivojevic Based on training data through 2025, Lola Radivojevic has shown more consistent results on hard courts, while Kristina Liutova is less exper... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
At the US Open (best-of-3 for women's singles), totals_sets most likely refers to whether the match goes the distance. Radivojevic's hard-co...
Radivojevic favored to close in straight sets on home-surface hard courts. Limited stamina data for Liutova in best-of-three format supports...
Given that both players, according to training data, exhibit competitive qualities and neither has an overwhelmingly dominant record, a clos...
Given the uncertainty in head-to-head performance, a match going to a deciding set is plausible. This prediction leans towards the 'over' gi...
Close matchups on hard courts often produce many games, especially if sets go to tiebreaks. Radivojevic's strong serve and Liutova's resilie...
Match winner
ConsensusLola Radivojevic 5/5
This prediction is based on training knowledge through early 2025; no live data is available for August 2026 form or seeding. Radivojevic ha...
Lola Radivojevic holds the edge on hard courts from known results in training data through 2025-09. Kristina Liutova lacks comparable senior...
Based on my training data, Lola Radivojevic has demonstrated a slightly more consistent performance record on hard courts compared to Kristi...
Based on general knowledge of tennis player performance trends, Lola Radivojevic is a slightly favored player. Without specific recent match...
Based on training data through 2025, Lola Radivojevic has shown more consistent results on hard courts, while Kristina Liutova is less exper...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Lola Radivojevic
Grok 4 Fast
Lola Radivojevic
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Lola Radivojevic
DeepSeek V3
Lola Radivojevic
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Lola Radivojevic
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
647ec2010d8d505e…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 22:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31166,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Kristina Liutova",
"home": "Lola Radivojevic"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.