Liudmila SamsonovavsMaya Joint
MJAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Liudmila Samsonova 5/5 models |
Under 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Liudmila Samsonova |
62%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Liudmila Samsonova Samsonova is an established WTA player with multiple tour wins and a solid hard-court game built on a heavy serve and aggressive baseline pl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 2.5 Samsonova's dominance in serve and aggression, combined with a likely ranking disparity, suggests a relatively straightforward victory in st... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Liudmila Samsonova |
61%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Liudmila Samsonova Samsonova holds the higher ranking and stronger hard-court results through 2025. Joint is a rising talent but still inconsistent against top...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under 2.5 Both players prefer aggressive baseline play on hard courts that often produces shorter matches. Samsonova's serve has been efficient in rec... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
80%
Liudmila Samsonova |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
Liudmila Samsonova Liudmila Samsonova, a highly-ranked WTA player known for her powerful serve and aggressive baseline game on hard courts, holds a significant...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Given Samsonova's dominant playing style and the perceived gap in skill and experience, a straight-sets victory is highly probable. Samsonov... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Liudmila Samsonova |
65%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Liudmila Samsonova Liudmila Samsonova is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA tour, with a proven track record on hard courts....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.0 Given Samsonova's clear advantage, it is likely she will win this match in straight sets. While Joint might occasionally hold serve or win a... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
75%
Liudmila Samsonova |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Liudmila Samsonova Based on training knowledge through 2025, Samsonova is a top-20 player with powerful serve and strong hard court game, while Joint is a risi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Given Samsonova's strong serving and Joint's ability to compete, the match is likely to be competitive. While Samsonova is favored, Joint ma... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLiudmila Samsonova 5/5
Samsonova is an established WTA player with multiple tour wins and a solid hard-court game built on a heavy serve and aggressive baseline pl...
Samsonova holds the higher ranking and stronger hard-court results through 2025. Joint is a rising talent but still inconsistent against top...
Liudmila Samsonova, a highly-ranked WTA player known for her powerful serve and aggressive baseline game on hard courts, holds a significant...
Liudmila Samsonova is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA tour, with a proven track record on hard courts....
Based on training knowledge through 2025, Samsonova is a top-20 player with powerful serve and strong hard court game, while Joint is a risi...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 2/10
Samsonova's dominance in serve and aggression, combined with a likely ranking disparity, suggests a relatively straightforward victory in st...
Both players prefer aggressive baseline play on hard courts that often produces shorter matches. Samsonova's serve has been efficient in rec...
Given Samsonova's dominant playing style and the perceived gap in skill and experience, a straight-sets victory is highly probable. Samsonov...
Given Samsonova's clear advantage, it is likely she will win this match in straight sets. While Joint might occasionally hold serve or win a...
Given Samsonova's strong serving and Joint's ability to compete, the match is likely to be competitive. While Samsonova is favored, Joint ma...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Liudmila Samsonova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Liudmila Samsonova
DeepSeek V3
Liudmila Samsonova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Liudmila Samsonova
Grok 4 Fast
Liudmila Samsonova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
7159dc28c500997e…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 21:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31791,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Maya Joint",
"home": "Liudmila Samsonova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.