Linda NoskovavsLanlana Tararudee
LTAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Linda Noskova 5/5 models |
under 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Linda Noskova |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Linda Noskova Linda Noskova is a Czech player with solid hard-court credentials and higher WTA ranking as of my training data (through early 2025). Lanlan...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 US Open women's singles matches are best-of-3 sets. While Noskova is the slight favourite, Tararudee has enough baseline tenacity and return... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Linda Noskova |
75%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Linda Noskova Training data through 2025 shows Linda Noskova as a far higher-ranked player than Lanlana Tararudee with superior hard-court results. The 20...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
under Training data through 2025 indicates Noskova routinely wins in straight sets against lower-ranked opponents on hard courts. The large rankin... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Linda Noskova |
58%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Linda Noskova Based on my training data through 2025-09, Linda Noskova is the more established and higher-ranked player, known for her powerful groundstro...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over_2.5 Although Linda Noskova is favored, Lanlana Tararudee is a competitive young player with potential, and Grand Slam matches often see unexpect... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Linda Noskova |
60%
Lanlana Tararudee |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Linda Noskova Linda Noskova is a higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA tour compared to Lanlana Tararudee. Noskova has demonstrated better...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Lanlana Tararudee Given Linda Noskova's advantage in skill and form, it is probable she will win in straight sets. While Tararudee may take a set on occasion,... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Linda Noskova |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Linda Noskova Based on training data through 2025-09, Linda Noskova has a higher ranking and more experience on hard courts, which is the surface at the U...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Noskova is likely to win in straight sets given her superior experience and level of play against a less seasoned opponent. Tararudee may st... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLinda Noskova 5/5
Linda Noskova is a Czech player with solid hard-court credentials and higher WTA ranking as of my training data (through early 2025). Lanlan...
Training data through 2025 shows Linda Noskova as a far higher-ranked player than Lanlana Tararudee with superior hard-court results. The 20...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, Linda Noskova is the more established and higher-ranked player, known for her powerful groundstro...
Linda Noskova is a higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA tour compared to Lanlana Tararudee. Noskova has demonstrated better...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Linda Noskova has a higher ranking and more experience on hard courts, which is the surface at the U...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
US Open women's singles matches are best-of-3 sets. While Noskova is the slight favourite, Tararudee has enough baseline tenacity and return...
Training data through 2025 indicates Noskova routinely wins in straight sets against lower-ranked opponents on hard courts. The large rankin...
Although Linda Noskova is favored, Lanlana Tararudee is a competitive young player with potential, and Grand Slam matches often see unexpect...
Given Linda Noskova's advantage in skill and form, it is probable she will win in straight sets. While Tararudee may take a set on occasion,...
Noskova is likely to win in straight sets given her superior experience and level of play against a less seasoned opponent. Tararudee may st...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Linda Noskova
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Linda Noskova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Linda Noskova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Linda Noskova
DeepSeek V3
Linda Noskova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d5d2cd93b41b6517…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Sep 3 · 02:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35146,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-02T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lanlana Tararudee",
"home": "Linda Noskova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.