Linda NoskovavsAryna Sabalenka
ASAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Aryna Sabalenka 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Aryna Sabalenka |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Aryna Sabalenka Sabalenka is a two-time US Open champion (2023, 2024) with proven dominance on hard courts, particularly in New York. Noskova is a rising pr...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Sabalenka's overwhelming serve velocity and hard-court dominance typically result in decisive victories; she rarely drops sets to lower-rank... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Aryna Sabalenka |
65%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Aryna Sabalenka Aryna Sabalenka holds a dominant head-to-head edge and superior hard-court results against Linda Noskova through 2025. Noskova has shown inc...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under 2.5 Sabalenka's serve dominance typically produces straight-sets wins on hard courts against lower-ranked opponents. Noskova lacks the sustained... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
78%
Aryna Sabalenka |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Aryna Sabalenka Based on my training data up to my last update, Aryna Sabalenka is a Grand Slam champion with a powerful game well-suited for hard courts, p...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Considering their previous encounters on hard courts, which included a three-set match at the Australian Open, Linda Noskova has demonstrate... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Aryna Sabalenka |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Aryna Sabalenka Aryna Sabalenka is a significantly more accomplished player than Linda Noskova, with multiple Grand Slam titles. Sabalenka's power game and...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over While Sabalenka is the favorite, Linda Noskova is a capable player who can potentially take a set. Noskova has shown flashes of brilliance a...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
68%
Linda Noskova |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Linda Noskova Training data through 2025-09 indicates Sabalenka is strong on hard courts, but Noskova has shown ability to beat top players on big stages,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both players are aggressive baseliners with strong serves, which often leads to competitive matches with tiebreaks and extended sets. Given... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAryna Sabalenka 4/5
Sabalenka is a two-time US Open champion (2023, 2024) with proven dominance on hard courts, particularly in New York. Noskova is a rising pr...
Aryna Sabalenka holds a dominant head-to-head edge and superior hard-court results against Linda Noskova through 2025. Noskova has shown inc...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Aryna Sabalenka is a Grand Slam champion with a powerful game well-suited for hard courts, p...
Aryna Sabalenka is a significantly more accomplished player than Linda Noskova, with multiple Grand Slam titles. Sabalenka's power game and...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Sabalenka is strong on hard courts, but Noskova has shown ability to beat top players on big stages,...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Sabalenka's overwhelming serve velocity and hard-court dominance typically result in decisive victories; she rarely drops sets to lower-rank...
Sabalenka's serve dominance typically produces straight-sets wins on hard courts against lower-ranked opponents. Noskova lacks the sustained...
Considering their previous encounters on hard courts, which included a three-set match at the Australian Open, Linda Noskova has demonstrate...
While Sabalenka is the favorite, Linda Noskova is a capable player who can potentially take a set. Noskova has shown flashes of brilliance a...
Both players are aggressive baseliners with strong serves, which often leads to competitive matches with tiebreaks and extended sets. Given...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Aryna Sabalenka
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Aryna Sabalenka
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Aryna Sabalenka
Claude Haiku 4.5
Aryna Sabalenka
DeepSeek V3
Linda Noskova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
5a257441801669ff…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 15:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38984,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Aryna Sabalenka",
"home": "Linda Noskova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.