Linda FruhvirtovavsPolina Kudermetova
PKYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Linda Fruhvirtova 4/5 models |
Over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Polina Kudermetova |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Polina Kudermetova Kudermetova is the more established WTA player with superior hard-court pedigree and consistency at Grand Slams; Fruhvirtova, while emerging...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are capable of competitive service holds on hard court, and Fruhvirtova's improving game may push Kudermetova to a tiebreak or... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Linda Fruhvirtova |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Linda Fruhvirtova Linda Fruhvirtova holds a higher career ranking and better hard-court results than Polina Kudermetova through 2025. Both players are young w...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 US Open first-round matches between lower-ranked players frequently end in straight sets due to one player dominating early. Fruhvirtova's s... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Linda Fruhvirtova |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Linda Fruhvirtova Based on my training data through its last update, Linda Fruhvirtova generally has a stronger hard-court game and a higher career trajectory...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets While Fruhvirtova is favored, Kudermetova is a capable competitor who often pushes matches, especially against similarly-ranked opponents. G... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Linda Fruhvirtova |
60%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Linda Fruhvirtova Linda Fruhvirtova is generally considered the more established and higher-ranked player, suggesting a higher probability of winning this mat...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.0 Given Linda Fruhvirtova's higher ranking and perceived advantage, it's likely she will win in straight sets. Polina Kudermetova, while capab... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Linda Fruhvirtova |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Linda Fruhvirtova Based on training data through early 2025, Fruhvirtova has shown stronger hard-court results and a higher ranking, giving her an edge on thi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Both players are competitive but not dominant, and their matches often extend to three sets. Given the lack of a clear favorite, a tight bat... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLinda Fruhvirtova 4/5
Kudermetova is the more established WTA player with superior hard-court pedigree and consistency at Grand Slams; Fruhvirtova, while emerging...
Linda Fruhvirtova holds a higher career ranking and better hard-court results than Polina Kudermetova through 2025. Both players are young w...
Based on my training data through its last update, Linda Fruhvirtova generally has a stronger hard-court game and a higher career trajectory...
Linda Fruhvirtova is generally considered the more established and higher-ranked player, suggesting a higher probability of winning this mat...
Based on training data through early 2025, Fruhvirtova has shown stronger hard-court results and a higher ranking, giving her an edge on thi...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 1/10
Both players are capable of competitive service holds on hard court, and Fruhvirtova's improving game may push Kudermetova to a tiebreak or...
US Open first-round matches between lower-ranked players frequently end in straight sets due to one player dominating early. Fruhvirtova's s...
While Fruhvirtova is favored, Kudermetova is a capable competitor who often pushes matches, especially against similarly-ranked opponents. G...
Given Linda Fruhvirtova's higher ranking and perceived advantage, it's likely she will win in straight sets. Polina Kudermetova, while capab...
Both players are competitive but not dominant, and their matches often extend to three sets. Given the lack of a clear favorite, a tight bat...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Linda Fruhvirtova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Polina Kudermetova
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Linda Fruhvirtova
Grok 4 Fast
Linda Fruhvirtova
DeepSeek V3
Linda Fruhvirtova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
803af25fc1bcab6f…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 19:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30740,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Polina Kudermetova",
"home": "Linda Fruhvirtova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.