Leylah FernandezvsJessica Pegula
JPAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Jessica Pegula 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Jessica Pegula |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Jessica Pegula Both players are established hard-court competitors, but Pegula has shown more consistency on the US Open's hard surface in recent years and...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Both Fernandez and Pegula are skilled baseline players capable of extended rallies and break-point opportunities, even if either serves well... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Jessica Pegula |
57%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Jessica Pegula Pegula holds a clear ranking and hard-court edge over Fernandez based on career results through 2025. Fernandez has shown inconsistency and...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
over 2.5 Best-of-3 format means matches often reach three sets when the lower-ranked player is competitive. Fernandez has taken sets off higher-ranke... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Jessica Pegula |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Jessica Pegula Based on historical performance and general player profiles from my training data (up to my last update), Jessica Pegula typically holds a h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Given the competitive nature of both players and their respective strengths on hard courts, a straightforward two-set victory is not highly... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Leylah Fernandez |
65%
Jessica Pegula |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Leylah Fernandez Leylah Fernandez has a strong head-to-head record against Jessica Pegula, winning their previous encounters. Fernandez also tends to perform...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Jessica Pegula Given the closely matched nature of these players and their previous encounters, this match is likely to go the distance. Both players have... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Leylah Fernandez |
65%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Leylah Fernandez Based on training data through September 2025, Fernandez has shown strong form on hard courts and has a competitive edge in this matchup, th...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
over_2.5 Both players are in good form and have a history of competitive three-set matches. Given the evenly matched nature of this encounter, it is... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusJessica Pegula 3/5
Both players are established hard-court competitors, but Pegula has shown more consistency on the US Open's hard surface in recent years and...
Pegula holds a clear ranking and hard-court edge over Fernandez based on career results through 2025. Fernandez has shown inconsistency and...
Based on historical performance and general player profiles from my training data (up to my last update), Jessica Pegula typically holds a h...
Leylah Fernandez has a strong head-to-head record against Jessica Pegula, winning their previous encounters. Fernandez also tends to perform...
Based on training data through September 2025, Fernandez has shown strong form on hard courts and has a competitive edge in this matchup, th...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Both Fernandez and Pegula are skilled baseline players capable of extended rallies and break-point opportunities, even if either serves well...
Best-of-3 format means matches often reach three sets when the lower-ranked player is competitive. Fernandez has taken sets off higher-ranke...
Given the competitive nature of both players and their respective strengths on hard courts, a straightforward two-set victory is not highly...
Given the closely matched nature of these players and their previous encounters, this match is likely to go the distance. Both players have...
Both players are in good form and have a history of competitive three-set matches. Given the evenly matched nature of this encounter, it is...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Jessica Pegula
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Jessica Pegula
Claude Haiku 4.5
Jessica Pegula
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Leylah Fernandez
DeepSeek V3
Leylah Fernandez
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
5e0a9a0902654b41…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 4 · 15:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35658,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-04T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 04 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Jessica Pegula",
"home": "Leylah Fernandez"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.