Leolia JeanjeanvsAnastasia Potapova
APAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Anastasia Potapova 4/5 models |
Under 2.5 sets 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Anastasia Potapova |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Anastasia Potapova Potapova is a more established WTA player with superior hard-court pedigree and consistency on the US Open surface compared to Jeanjean, who...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players have shown ability to win sets on hard court and push matches to three, especially in early rounds where intensity may fluctuat... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Anastasia Potapova |
58%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Anastasia Potapova Training data through 2023 shows Potapova with superior hard-court results and higher ranking than Jeanjean. Jeanjean has limited Grand Slam...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under Training data through 2023 indicates Potapova often closes matches in straight sets against lower-ranked opponents. Jeanjean's return game i... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
80%
Anastasia Potapova |
70%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
Anastasia Potapova Based on my training data up to my last update, Anastasia Potapova is historically the stronger player, especially on hard courts. Leolia Je...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Under 2.5 sets Given Potapova's historical dominance on hard courts against Jeanjean, a straight-sets victory for Potapova is highly probable. Jeanjean's s... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
70%
Anastasia Potapova |
55%
Anastasia Potapova |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Anastasia Potapova Anastasia Potapova is significantly higher ranked and has achieved more success on the WTA tour, including multiple titles. While Leolia Jea...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Anastasia Potapova While Potapova is the favorite, Jeanjean has shown she can compete and take sets off stronger opponents. Given this is a Grand Slam match, t...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Leolia Jeanjean |
55%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Leolia Jeanjean Based on training data through early 2025, Leolia Jeanjean has been in strong form on hard courts, while Potapova has struggled with consist...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 sets Jeanjean has been serving well and finishing matches in straight sets recently. Potapova tends to lose in two sets when facing aggressive hi... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAnastasia Potapova 4/5
Potapova is a more established WTA player with superior hard-court pedigree and consistency on the US Open surface compared to Jeanjean, who...
Training data through 2023 shows Potapova with superior hard-court results and higher ranking than Jeanjean. Jeanjean has limited Grand Slam...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Anastasia Potapova is historically the stronger player, especially on hard courts. Leolia Je...
Anastasia Potapova is significantly higher ranked and has achieved more success on the WTA tour, including multiple titles. While Leolia Jea...
Based on training data through early 2025, Leolia Jeanjean has been in strong form on hard courts, while Potapova has struggled with consist...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 sets 2/10
Both players have shown ability to win sets on hard court and push matches to three, especially in early rounds where intensity may fluctuat...
Training data through 2023 indicates Potapova often closes matches in straight sets against lower-ranked opponents. Jeanjean's return game i...
Given Potapova's historical dominance on hard courts against Jeanjean, a straight-sets victory for Potapova is highly probable. Jeanjean's s...
While Potapova is the favorite, Jeanjean has shown she can compete and take sets off stronger opponents. Given this is a Grand Slam match, t...
Jeanjean has been serving well and finishing matches in straight sets recently. Potapova tends to lose in two sets when facing aggressive hi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Anastasia Potapova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Anastasia Potapova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anastasia Potapova
Grok 4 Fast
Anastasia Potapova
DeepSeek V3
Leolia Jeanjean
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
50e7c3436904355c…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Sep 3 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35501,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-03T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 03 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Anastasia Potapova",
"home": "Leolia Jeanjean"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.