Learner TienvsJakub Mensik
JMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 37.5 2/10 models |
Jakub Mensik 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Over 2.5 |
58%
Jakub Mensik |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 US Open men's singles is best-of-5 sets; a three-set match would mean either a dominant performance or a surprise rout. Both Mensik and Tien...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Jakub Mensik Mensik, a rising Czech talent born in 2005, has shown rapid improvement on hard courts and possesses a strong serve and aggressive baseline... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
over 38.5 |
58%
Jakub Mensik |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 38.5 Hard-court rallies at altitude in New York tend to produce longer sets. Both athletes convert breaks at solid rates but hold serve reliably,...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Jakub Mensik Mensik holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results through 2025. Tien benefits from home support at the US Open but lacks the exp... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
40%
4 sets |
58%
Jakub Mensik |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
40%
4 sets As a best-of-5 match between two competitive young players, a straight-sets victory is less likely but possible. Mensik has the firepower fo...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Jakub Mensik Jakub Mensik's powerful serve and aggressive baseline game typically give him an edge on hard courts. While Learner Tien is a strong competi... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
3 |
55%
Learner Tien |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
3 Given the perceived slight edge for Learner Tien and the potential for a competitive match between two emerging players, it's likely this ma...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Learner Tien Based on training data through 2025-09, Learner Tien is a promising young American player with a strong hard court game. While Jakub Mensik... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Over 3.5 |
55%
Learner Tien |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Given the competitive balance indicated by the h2h probabilities, this match is likely to go deep. Both players have strong serves and can h...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Learner Tien Training data through 2025-09: Learner Tien has shown greater consistency on hard courts and a slightly higher return-game level, which is c... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 37.5 2/10
US Open men's singles is best-of-5 sets; a three-set match would mean either a dominant performance or a surprise rout. Both Mensik and Tien...
Hard-court rallies at altitude in New York tend to produce longer sets. Both athletes convert breaks at solid rates but hold serve reliably,...
As a best-of-5 match between two competitive young players, a straight-sets victory is less likely but possible. Mensik has the firepower fo...
Given the perceived slight edge for Learner Tien and the potential for a competitive match between two emerging players, it's likely this ma...
Given the competitive balance indicated by the h2h probabilities, this match is likely to go deep. Both players have strong serves and can h...
Match winner
ConsensusJakub Mensik 3/5
Mensik, a rising Czech talent born in 2005, has shown rapid improvement on hard courts and possesses a strong serve and aggressive baseline...
Mensik holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results through 2025. Tien benefits from home support at the US Open but lacks the exp...
Jakub Mensik's powerful serve and aggressive baseline game typically give him an edge on hard courts. While Learner Tien is a strong competi...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Learner Tien is a promising young American player with a strong hard court game. While Jakub Mensik...
Training data through 2025-09: Learner Tien has shown greater consistency on hard courts and a slightly higher return-game level, which is c...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Jakub Mensik
Grok 4 Fast
Jakub Mensik
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Jakub Mensik
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Learner Tien
DeepSeek V3
Learner Tien
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
79eb4e537235c7e7…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 6 · 02:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 36173,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-05T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 05 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Jakub Mensik",
"home": "Learner Tien"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.