Lautaro MidonvsKyrian Jacquet
KJYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Kyrian Jacquet 3/5 models |
over 4/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Lautaro Midon |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Lautaro Midon Both players are relatively obscure on the professional circuit as of my training cutoff (September 2024), making this a data-sparse predict...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 US Open first-round matches between lower-ranked players often feature competitive play and occasional upsets, increasing the likelihood of... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Kyrian Jacquet |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Kyrian Jacquet No prior head-to-head exists between these lower-ranked players and both lack extensive main-draw hard-court experience at Grand Slam level....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over US Open first-round matches on hard often extend to four or five sets when both players are unproven at this level. Serve-break volatility f... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Kyrian Jacquet |
40%
4 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Kyrian Jacquet Based on training data up to my last update, Kyrian Jacquet generally exhibits slightly more adaptability on hard courts compared to Lautaro...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
40%
4 sets Given that both players are more comfortable on clay rather than hard courts, their match is likely to be competitive with potential for mom... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Kyrian Jacquet |
58%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Kyrian Jacquet While both players are relatively lower ranked, Midon's strengths lie on clay, and Jacquet has achieved a higher ranking on faster surfaces....
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Both players are relatively unproven at higher levels, and their rankings suggest closely matched abilities. This could lead to a competitiv...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Lautaro Midon |
55%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Lautaro Midon Based on training data through 2025-09, Lautaro Midon has shown stronger results on hard courts in Challenger events, while Kyrian Jacquet h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_3.5 In best-of-five matches at the US Open, qualifiers often split sets early due to nerves, leading to longer matches. Both players have simila... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKyrian Jacquet 3/5
Both players are relatively obscure on the professional circuit as of my training cutoff (September 2024), making this a data-sparse predict...
No prior head-to-head exists between these lower-ranked players and both lack extensive main-draw hard-court experience at Grand Slam level....
Based on training data up to my last update, Kyrian Jacquet generally exhibits slightly more adaptability on hard courts compared to Lautaro...
While both players are relatively lower ranked, Midon's strengths lie on clay, and Jacquet has achieved a higher ranking on faster surfaces....
Based on training data through 2025-09, Lautaro Midon has shown stronger results on hard courts in Challenger events, while Kyrian Jacquet h...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/10
US Open first-round matches between lower-ranked players often feature competitive play and occasional upsets, increasing the likelihood of...
US Open first-round matches on hard often extend to four or five sets when both players are unproven at this level. Serve-break volatility f...
Given that both players are more comfortable on clay rather than hard courts, their match is likely to be competitive with potential for mom...
Both players are relatively unproven at higher levels, and their rankings suggest closely matched abilities. This could lead to a competitiv...
In best-of-five matches at the US Open, qualifiers often split sets early due to nerves, leading to longer matches. Both players have simila...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Kyrian Jacquet
DeepSeek V3
Lautaro Midon
Claude Haiku 4.5
Lautaro Midon
Grok 4 Fast
Kyrian Jacquet
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Kyrian Jacquet
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d48d464b5a8d76ef…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 16:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30792,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T16:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Kyrian Jacquet",
"home": "Lautaro Midon"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.