Kristina MladenovicvsElvina Kalieva
EKYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Kristina Mladenovic 4/5 models |
Over 1.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Kristina Mladenovic |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Kristina Mladenovic Mladenovic, a veteran French player with multiple Grand Slam quarterfinal appearances, brings significantly more experience and composure in...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 While Mladenovic is favoured, Kalieva's youth and occasional breakthrough performances suggest she will push at least one set to a tiebreak... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Kristina Mladenovic |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Kristina Mladenovic Mladenovic holds the clear experience edge on hard courts with multiple US Open appearances and higher career ranking. Kalieva is a younger...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Mladenovic's serve and experience should limit extended rallies on hard courts. Kalieva lacks the consistency to force three sets against hi... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Elvina Kalieva |
58%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Elvina Kalieva Based on career trajectories observed in my training data up to my last update, Kristina Mladenovic's singles form had significantly decline...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Sets Despite favoring Kalieva to win, Mladenovic's veteran experience, particularly at a Grand Slam and on hard courts, suggests she has the capa... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Kristina Mladenovic |
65%
Elvina Kalieva |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Kristina Mladenovic Kristina Mladenovic is a significantly more experienced and accomplished player on the WTA tour, with multiple Grand Slam titles in doubles...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Elvina Kalieva Given Kristina Mladenovic's significant experience advantage and higher general level of play, she is likely to win this match in straight s... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
70%
Kristina Mladenovic |
80%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Kristina Mladenovic Kristina Mladenovic is a seasoned WTA player with extensive experience on hard courts, including past success at the US Open, whereas Elvina...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
80%
Over 1.5 Given the gap in experience and ranking, Mladenovic is likely to win in straight sets, but Kalieva's ability to compete in lower-level event... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKristina Mladenovic 4/5
Mladenovic, a veteran French player with multiple Grand Slam quarterfinal appearances, brings significantly more experience and composure in...
Mladenovic holds the clear experience edge on hard courts with multiple US Open appearances and higher career ranking. Kalieva is a younger...
Based on career trajectories observed in my training data up to my last update, Kristina Mladenovic's singles form had significantly decline...
Kristina Mladenovic is a significantly more experienced and accomplished player on the WTA tour, with multiple Grand Slam titles in doubles...
Kristina Mladenovic is a seasoned WTA player with extensive experience on hard courts, including past success at the US Open, whereas Elvina...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 1.5 2/10
While Mladenovic is favoured, Kalieva's youth and occasional breakthrough performances suggest she will push at least one set to a tiebreak...
Mladenovic's serve and experience should limit extended rallies on hard courts. Kalieva lacks the consistency to force three sets against hi...
Despite favoring Kalieva to win, Mladenovic's veteran experience, particularly at a Grand Slam and on hard courts, suggests she has the capa...
Given Kristina Mladenovic's significant experience advantage and higher general level of play, she is likely to win this match in straight s...
Given the gap in experience and ranking, Mladenovic is likely to win in straight sets, but Kalieva's ability to compete in lower-level event...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Kristina Mladenovic
DeepSeek V3
Kristina Mladenovic
Grok 4 Fast
Kristina Mladenovic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Kristina Mladenovic
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Elvina Kalieva
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
f6f74a9cfe9b1597…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Aug 25 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30846,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-25T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Elvina Kalieva",
"home": "Kristina Mladenovic"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.