Kristina LiutovavsZheng Qinwen
ZQAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Zheng Qinwen 5/5 models |
Under 2.5 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Zheng Qinwen |
62%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Zheng Qinwen Zheng Qinwen is a top-20 WTA player with strong hard-court credentials and has shown consistent form in 2026; Kristina Liutova is a lower-ra...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 2.5 In a best-of-3 Grand Slam match, Zheng's superior ranking and hard-court prowess suggest a straight-sets victory is more likely than a three... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
92%
Zheng Qinwen |
78%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
92%
Zheng Qinwen Zheng Qinwen is a top-10 player with proven hard-court success while Kristina Liutova appears to be a low-ranked or unproven opponent. Train...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
78%
under_2.5 Best-of-3 format on hard courts favors the higher-ranked player finishing in straight sets. Zheng's serve and return stats limit extended se... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
95%
Zheng Qinwen |
85%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
95%
Zheng Qinwen Based on my training data through early 2023, Zheng Qinwen is a highly-ranked WTA player known for her powerful game and strong performance...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
85%
Under 2.5 Given the expected significant skill gap between Zheng Qinwen and Kristina Liutova, Zheng is heavily favored to win this best-of-three match... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
85%
Zheng Qinwen |
70%
Zheng Qinwen |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Zheng Qinwen Zheng Qinwen is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA tour. She has a proven track record on hard courts, whi...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Zheng Qinwen Given Zheng Qinwen's superior ranking and performance, she is expected to win this match comfortably. It's likely she will secure a straight...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
90%
Zheng Qinwen |
70%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
90%
Zheng Qinwen Based on training data through 2025-09, Zheng Qinwen is a top-10 player with a strong hard-court game, while Liutova is a much lower-ranked...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Under 2.5 Given the wide skill gap, Zheng should win in straight sets. Liutova lacks the weapons to take a set off a top-10 player on this surface. Hi... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusZheng Qinwen 5/5
Zheng Qinwen is a top-20 WTA player with strong hard-court credentials and has shown consistent form in 2026; Kristina Liutova is a lower-ra...
Zheng Qinwen is a top-10 player with proven hard-court success while Kristina Liutova appears to be a low-ranked or unproven opponent. Train...
Based on my training data through early 2023, Zheng Qinwen is a highly-ranked WTA player known for her powerful game and strong performance...
Zheng Qinwen is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA tour. She has a proven track record on hard courts, whi...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Zheng Qinwen is a top-10 player with a strong hard-court game, while Liutova is a much lower-ranked...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 3/10
In a best-of-3 Grand Slam match, Zheng's superior ranking and hard-court prowess suggest a straight-sets victory is more likely than a three...
Best-of-3 format on hard courts favors the higher-ranked player finishing in straight sets. Zheng's serve and return stats limit extended se...
Given the expected significant skill gap between Zheng Qinwen and Kristina Liutova, Zheng is heavily favored to win this best-of-three match...
Given Zheng Qinwen's superior ranking and performance, she is expected to win this match comfortably. It's likely she will secure a straight...
Given the wide skill gap, Zheng should win in straight sets. Liutova lacks the weapons to take a set off a top-10 player on this surface. Hi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Zheng Qinwen
Grok 4 Fast
Zheng Qinwen
DeepSeek V3
Zheng Qinwen
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Zheng Qinwen
Claude Haiku 4.5
Zheng Qinwen
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
29fd050c8422ded1…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 15:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33710,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Zheng Qinwen",
"home": "Kristina Liutova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.