KI KlaksvikvsRiga
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
8 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Riga 3/5 models |
Riga 4/5 models |
over 2/5 models |
yes 2/5 models |
Riga 4/5 models |
Riga 3/5 models |
Riga / Riga 4/5 models |
0-2 2/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
23%
Draw |
38%
Riga |
60%
under |
55%
no |
38%
Riga |
38%
Riga |
38%
Riga / Riga |
20%
0-1 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
23%
Draw Recent form indicates a closely contested match, with both teams having strengths and weaknesses. The most likely outcome is a draw, as sugg...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
38%
Riga Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win, even without the draw option. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under Both teams have shown defensive vulnerabilities recently, suggesting a low-scoring match. ([forebet.com](https://www.forebet.com/en/football...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
no Both teams have shown defensive vulnerabilities recently, suggesting a low-scoring match. ([forebet.com](https://www.forebet.com/en/football...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
38%
Riga Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win by at least one goal. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https://www.sp...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
38%
Riga Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win by at least one goal. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https://www.sp...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
Riga / Riga Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win both at halftime and fulltime. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
0-1 Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win 1-0. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https://www.sportsmole.co.uk/fo...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
48%
Riga |
55%
Riga |
53%
under |
56%
no |
51%
Riga |
52%
Riga |
38%
Riga / Riga |
22%
0-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
48%
Riga Riga's recent form of WDWWW with only 3 goals conceded contrasts sharply with KI Klaksvik's WLLLW and 11 conceded. Training data through 202...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Riga Riga's attacking output of 14 goals in 5 matches and clean defensive record favor them on the road. KI's leaky defense at home makes a draw...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
under KI's poor home scoring combined with Riga's low concession rate points to a low-scoring affair. Conference League qualifiers between defensi...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
56%
no Riga's 3 goals conceded in 5 matches and KI's low home scoring output suggest both teams will not score. Defensive setups in European ties f...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Riga Riga's superior recent results and goal difference make them the side likely to cover a -1 spread. KI's three home losses indicate vulnerabi...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
52%
Riga Riga's form edge and defensive solidity give them the edge on Asian handicap. KI's inconsistent home performances make them unlikely to over...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
Riga / Riga Riga's strong away form and KI's leaky home defense point to an away win after leading or drawing at half time. Low scoring trends favor con...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
0-2 Riga's defensive record and KI's poor home scoring suggest a narrow away win. Low totals expected from form data. Training knowledge through... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Riga |
70%
Riga |
58%
Over 2.5 |
55%
No |
55%
Riga -1 |
60%
Riga -0.75 |
40%
Riga / Riga |
18%
0-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Riga Riga exhibits superior recent form, scoring significantly more goals and conceding far fewer than KI Klaksvik. Although Klaksvik has a home...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
70%
Riga Given Riga's strong H2H probability and excellent recent form, they are the clear favourite. Removing the draw option further solidifies the...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Riga's offense has been prolific, scoring 14 goals in their last five matches. KI Klaksvik's defense has been vulnerable, conceding 11 goals...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
No While Riga's offense is strong, their defense is also very tight, having conceded only 3 goals in 5 matches. KI Klaksvik, despite being at h...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Riga -1 Given Riga's strong offensive output and Klaksvik's defensive struggles, a multi-goal victory for Riga is a reasonable expectation. Riga's a...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
Riga -0.75 Riga is the stronger team with superior recent form in both attack and defense. A -0.75 Asian Handicap suggests they are expected to win by...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
40%
Riga / Riga Given Riga's attacking strength and overall better form, they are likely to take an early lead and maintain it throughout the match. KI Klak...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
0-2 Considering Riga's strong defensive record (0.6 goals conceded per game) and their robust attack (2.8 goals scored per game), a clean sheet... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Riga |
58%
Riga |
55%
over |
58%
yes |
55%
Riga |
56%
Riga |
48%
Riga / Riga |
15%
2-1 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Riga Riga has a significantly better recent form (4 wins in last 5) compared to KI Klaksvik (2 wins in last 5 with more losses). This suggests Ri...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
Riga Given Riga's superior recent form and attacking output, they are more likely to secure at least a draw. The draw no bet market favors Riga d...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Riga has a strong attacking record (14 goals in last 5), and KI Klaksvik has a weak defensive record (11 goals conceded in last 5). This sug...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
58%
yes Riga's strong offense (14 goals in 5 games) and KI Klaksvik's poor defense (11 goals conceded in 5 games) indicate that both teams are likel...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Riga Riga's superior form and attacking prowess suggest they are capable of winning by more than one goal. KI Klaksvik's recent defensive struggl...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
56%
Riga Given Riga's dominant recent form and scoring ability, they are favored to win this match. Their ability to score goals suggests they can ov...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
48%
Riga / Riga Riga's strong recent form and attacking potential suggest they are likely to be leading at halftime and maintain that advantage to win the m...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
2-1 Considering Riga's strong recent form and attacking prowess (14 goals in 5 games), they are favored to win. KI Klaksvik's defense has been l... |
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
45%
KI Klaksvik |
55%
KI Klaksvik |
55%
over |
55%
yes |
50%
Riga |
50%
Riga +0.5 |
20%
Draw / KI Klaksvik |
12%
2-1 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
KI Klaksvik KI Klaksvik have home advantage and a better recent record at home, but their overall form is inconsistent. Riga are in strong form with 4 w...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
KI Klaksvik Excluding the draw, I give the edge to Klaksvik at home. Their home form is better and they tend to be solid in these qualifiers. Riga are s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown goal involvement: Klaksvik scored 6 in 5 but also conceded 11, while Riga scored 14 in 5. These are two sides that ten...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Riga are scoring well, and Klaksvik have been leaky at the back. However, Klaksvik have also scored in most matches, so it's likely both tea...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Riga With a -1 spread, the home team must win by 2 or more. Klaksvik's home form is decent but not dominant, and Riga are strong. It's a close ca...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
Riga +0.5 This is a close match, and the away team with a +0.5 handicap means a win or draw for Riga. Given Riga's superior form, they are likely to a...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
Draw / KI Klaksvik Home teams often start strongly, so a halftime lead is possible, but Riga's resilience means the final result could go either way. I expect...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
2-1 Given both teams' scoring ability and defensive weaknesses, a 2-1 home win is a plausible outcome. Klaksvik are likely to score at home, and... |
|||||||||
Match winner
ConsensusRiga 3/5
Recent form indicates a closely contested match, with both teams having strengths and weaknesses. The most likely outcome is a draw, as sugg...
Riga's recent form of WDWWW with only 3 goals conceded contrasts sharply with KI Klaksvik's WLLLW and 11 conceded. Training data through 202...
Riga exhibits superior recent form, scoring significantly more goals and conceding far fewer than KI Klaksvik. Although Klaksvik has a home...
Riga has a significantly better recent form (4 wins in last 5) compared to KI Klaksvik (2 wins in last 5 with more losses). This suggests Ri...
KI Klaksvik have home advantage and a better recent record at home, but their overall form is inconsistent. Riga are in strong form with 4 w...
Draw no bet
ConsensusRiga 4/5
Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win, even without the draw option. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https...
Riga's attacking output of 14 goals in 5 matches and clean defensive record favor them on the road. KI's leaky defense at home makes a draw...
Given Riga's strong H2H probability and excellent recent form, they are the clear favourite. Removing the draw option further solidifies the...
Given Riga's superior recent form and attacking output, they are more likely to secure at least a draw. The draw no bet market favors Riga d...
Excluding the draw, I give the edge to Klaksvik at home. Their home form is better and they tend to be solid in these qualifiers. Riga are s...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/5
Both teams have shown defensive vulnerabilities recently, suggesting a low-scoring match. ([forebet.com](https://www.forebet.com/en/football...
KI's poor home scoring combined with Riga's low concession rate points to a low-scoring affair. Conference League qualifiers between defensi...
Riga's offense has been prolific, scoring 14 goals in their last five matches. KI Klaksvik's defense has been vulnerable, conceding 11 goals...
Riga has a strong attacking record (14 goals in last 5), and KI Klaksvik has a weak defensive record (11 goals conceded in last 5). This sug...
Both teams have shown goal involvement: Klaksvik scored 6 in 5 but also conceded 11, while Riga scored 14 in 5. These are two sides that ten...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 2/5
Both teams have shown defensive vulnerabilities recently, suggesting a low-scoring match. ([forebet.com](https://www.forebet.com/en/football...
Riga's 3 goals conceded in 5 matches and KI's low home scoring output suggest both teams will not score. Defensive setups in European ties f...
While Riga's offense is strong, their defense is also very tight, having conceded only 3 goals in 5 matches. KI Klaksvik, despite being at h...
Riga's strong offense (14 goals in 5 games) and KI Klaksvik's poor defense (11 goals conceded in 5 games) indicate that both teams are likel...
Riga are scoring well, and Klaksvik have been leaky at the back. However, Klaksvik have also scored in most matches, so it's likely both tea...
Spread
ConsensusRiga 4/5
Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win by at least one goal. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https://www.sp...
Riga's superior recent results and goal difference make them the side likely to cover a -1 spread. KI's three home losses indicate vulnerabi...
Given Riga's strong offensive output and Klaksvik's defensive struggles, a multi-goal victory for Riga is a reasonable expectation. Riga's a...
Riga's superior form and attacking prowess suggest they are capable of winning by more than one goal. KI Klaksvik's recent defensive struggl...
With a -1 spread, the home team must win by 2 or more. Klaksvik's home form is decent but not dominant, and Riga are strong. It's a close ca...
Asian handicap
ConsensusRiga 3/5
Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win by at least one goal. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https://www.sp...
Riga's form edge and defensive solidity give them the edge on Asian handicap. KI's inconsistent home performances make them unlikely to over...
Riga is the stronger team with superior recent form in both attack and defense. A -0.75 Asian Handicap suggests they are expected to win by...
Given Riga's dominant recent form and scoring ability, they are favored to win this match. Their ability to score goals suggests they can ov...
This is a close match, and the away team with a +0.5 handicap means a win or draw for Riga. Given Riga's superior form, they are likely to a...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusRiga / Riga 4/5
Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win both at halftime and fulltime. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https...
Riga's strong away form and KI's leaky home defense point to an away win after leading or drawing at half time. Low scoring trends favor con...
Given Riga's attacking strength and overall better form, they are likely to take an early lead and maintain it throughout the match. KI Klak...
Riga's strong recent form and attacking potential suggest they are likely to be leading at halftime and maintain that advantage to win the m...
Home teams often start strongly, so a halftime lead is possible, but Riga's resilience means the final result could go either way. I expect...
Correct score
Consensus0-2 2/5
Riga FC's superior recent form and attacking prowess make them the favorites to win 1-0. ([sportsmole.co.uk](https://www.sportsmole.co.uk/fo...
Riga's defensive record and KI's poor home scoring suggest a narrow away win. Low totals expected from form data. Training knowledge through...
Considering Riga's strong defensive record (0.6 goals conceded per game) and their robust attack (2.8 goals scored per game), a clean sheet...
Considering Riga's strong recent form and attacking prowess (14 goals in 5 games), they are favored to win. KI Klaksvik's defense has been l...
Given both teams' scoring ability and defensive weaknesses, a 2-1 home win is a plausible outcome. Klaksvik are likely to score at home, and...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Riga
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Riga
Grok 4 Fast
Riga
DeepSeek V3
KI Klaksvik
GPT-4o Mini
Draw
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Near kickoffRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Call the exact final score
Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
33c2c0f9580bae37…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 20 · 17:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 27948,
"sport": "football",
"venue": null,
"league": "UEFA Europa Conference League",
"starts_at": "2026-08-20T17:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 20 Aug 2026 17:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Riga",
"home": "KI Klaksvik"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WDWWW",
"record": "4W-1D-0L",
"scored": 14,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 3
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WLLLW",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 6,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 11
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 3
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
8 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.