Kenta MiyoshivsPierre-Hugues Herbert
PHYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Pierre-Hugues Herbert 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Pierre-Hugues Herbert |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Pierre-Hugues Herbert Pierre-Hugues Herbert is a seasoned ATP competitor with strong hard-court credentials and a reliable serve-and-volley game suited to fast ou...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Herbert's serve strength and net game should give him a slight edge, but Miyoshi's youth and hardcourt potential suggest competitive sets ra... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Pierre-Hugues Herbert |
61%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Pierre-Hugues Herbert Pierre-Hugues Herbert holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Kenta Miyoshi on hard courts. Herbert's serve and return game translate...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under 2.5 Best-of-3 format favors the higher-ranked Herbert finishing in straight sets. Miyoshi lacks the firepower to force a deciding set on this su... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
85%
Pierre-Hugues Herbert |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Pierre-Hugues Herbert Based on training data up to my last update, Pierre-Hugues Herbert possesses significantly more experience on the ATP Tour, including a high...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Pierre-Hugues Herbert's expected dominance in this best-of-3 match, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome. His superior... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
70%
Pierre-Hugues Herbert |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Pierre-Hugues Herbert Pierre-Hugues Herbert is a significantly more accomplished player with a higher career-high ranking and more Grand Slam success than Kenta M...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over While Herbert is the favorite, Miyoshi is expected to put up a fight, especially if he can leverage any serving strengths. A three-set match... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Kenta Miyoshi |
72%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Kenta Miyoshi Training data through 2025-09 indicates Miyoshi is a rising prospect with solid hard-court results, while Herbert is a veteran doubles speci...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
72%
under 2.5 With Miyoshi favored, the match is likely to be decided in straight sets. Herbert's serve can keep sets close, but his recent singles form s... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusPierre-Hugues Herbert 4/5
Pierre-Hugues Herbert is a seasoned ATP competitor with strong hard-court credentials and a reliable serve-and-volley game suited to fast ou...
Pierre-Hugues Herbert holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Kenta Miyoshi on hard courts. Herbert's serve and return game translate...
Based on training data up to my last update, Pierre-Hugues Herbert possesses significantly more experience on the ATP Tour, including a high...
Pierre-Hugues Herbert is a significantly more accomplished player with a higher career-high ranking and more Grand Slam success than Kenta M...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Miyoshi is a rising prospect with solid hard-court results, while Herbert is a veteran doubles speci...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Herbert's serve strength and net game should give him a slight edge, but Miyoshi's youth and hardcourt potential suggest competitive sets ra...
Best-of-3 format favors the higher-ranked Herbert finishing in straight sets. Miyoshi lacks the firepower to force a deciding set on this su...
Given Pierre-Hugues Herbert's expected dominance in this best-of-3 match, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome. His superior...
While Herbert is the favorite, Miyoshi is expected to put up a fight, especially if he can leverage any serving strengths. A three-set match...
With Miyoshi favored, the match is likely to be decided in straight sets. Herbert's serve can keep sets close, but his recent singles form s...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Grok 4 Fast
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
DeepSeek V3
Kenta Miyoshi
Claude Haiku 4.5
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
7d13405e11aad977…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 15:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29752,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Pierre-Hugues Herbert",
"home": "Kenta Miyoshi"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.