Kayla CrossvsRobin Montgomery
RMYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Robin Montgomery 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Robin Montgomery |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Robin Montgomery Robin Montgomery has shown stronger hard-court form and a more aggressive baseline game suited to the US Open's pace. Cross is a capable pla...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 In US Open first-round women's matches between players of similar ranking tiers, competitive sets are common. Montgomery's aggressive style... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Robin Montgomery |
53%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Robin Montgomery Robin Montgomery holds the higher junior pedigree and better hard-court results from her 2023-2024 development phase. Kayla Cross lacks comp...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over_2.5 Best-of-3 format on hard courts at the US Open often produces three-set matches for players of this level. Neither has dominant serve metric... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Robin Montgomery |
55%
3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Robin Montgomery Predicting from training data through 2025-09, Robin Montgomery often displays a powerful and aggressive game well-suited for hard courts li...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
3 Both players are competitive emerging talents, and their matches are often closely contested. A three-set battle is a common outcome when tw... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Kayla Cross |
52%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Kayla Cross Based on training data, Kayla Cross is generally favored in this matchup. While specific recent form is unavailable, Cross has historically...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Given the slight uncertainty in the head-to-head and the potential for close sets between these players, the match is likely to go to three... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Kayla Cross |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Kayla Cross As of my training data through September 2025, Kayla Cross has shown more consistent form on hard courts and has a stronger serve, which is...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Given the competitive nature of grand slam first-round matches between two similar-level players, a three-set match is likely. Both competit... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusRobin Montgomery 3/5
Robin Montgomery has shown stronger hard-court form and a more aggressive baseline game suited to the US Open's pace. Cross is a capable pla...
Robin Montgomery holds the higher junior pedigree and better hard-court results from her 2023-2024 development phase. Kayla Cross lacks comp...
Predicting from training data through 2025-09, Robin Montgomery often displays a powerful and aggressive game well-suited for hard courts li...
Based on training data, Kayla Cross is generally favored in this matchup. While specific recent form is unavailable, Cross has historically...
As of my training data through September 2025, Kayla Cross has shown more consistent form on hard courts and has a stronger serve, which is...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
In US Open first-round women's matches between players of similar ranking tiers, competitive sets are common. Montgomery's aggressive style...
Best-of-3 format on hard courts at the US Open often produces three-set matches for players of this level. Neither has dominant serve metric...
Both players are competitive emerging talents, and their matches are often closely contested. A three-set battle is a common outcome when tw...
Given the slight uncertainty in the head-to-head and the potential for close sets between these players, the match is likely to go to three...
Given the competitive nature of grand slam first-round matches between two similar-level players, a three-set match is likely. Both competit...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Robin Montgomery
Grok 4 Fast
Robin Montgomery
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Robin Montgomery
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Kayla Cross
DeepSeek V3
Kayla Cross
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b3866860e6b20e0e…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30752,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Robin Montgomery",
"home": "Kayla Cross"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.