Katie VolynetsvsMananchaya Sawangkaew
MSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Katie Volynets 5/5 models |
Under 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Katie Volynets |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Katie Volynets Katie Volynets is a more established American player with consistent WTA circuit experience and better serve consistency on hard courts. Man...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 In WTA matches on hard courts, competitive encounters between mid-tier players often extend to three sets, especially early in tournaments w... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Katie Volynets |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Katie Volynets Katie Volynets holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Mananchaya Sawangkaew based on training data through 2025-09. The hard-court s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Volynets is expected to win in straight sets given the talent gap. Best-of-three format on hard courts often produces shorter matches when o... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
72%
Katie Volynets |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Katie Volynets Katie Volynets is generally a more consistent and higher-ranked player, especially on hard courts which is the likely surface for the Philly...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Given Volynets' advantage, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome. While Sawangkaew has shown flashes of brilliance, sustainin... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Katie Volynets |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Katie Volynets Katie Volynets is generally ranked higher and has more experience on the WTA tour than Mananchaya Sawangkaew. Volynets has shown a better ab...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 Given Volynets' slight edge and the potential for a competitive match, it's likely to go to three sets. While Volynets is favored, Sawangkae... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Katie Volynets |
78%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Katie Volynets Training data through 2025-09. Volynets has strong hard-court results and consistent performance on this surface, while Sawangkaew is effect...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
78%
Over 1.5 Both players are competitive at this level and rallies are typically extended, especially in a best-of-3 format. Sawangkaew's fighting spiri... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKatie Volynets 5/5
Katie Volynets is a more established American player with consistent WTA circuit experience and better serve consistency on hard courts. Man...
Katie Volynets holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Mananchaya Sawangkaew based on training data through 2025-09. The hard-court s...
Katie Volynets is generally a more consistent and higher-ranked player, especially on hard courts which is the likely surface for the Philly...
Katie Volynets is generally ranked higher and has more experience on the WTA tour than Mananchaya Sawangkaew. Volynets has shown a better ab...
Training data through 2025-09. Volynets has strong hard-court results and consistent performance on this surface, while Sawangkaew is effect...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 1/10
In WTA matches on hard courts, competitive encounters between mid-tier players often extend to three sets, especially early in tournaments w...
Volynets is expected to win in straight sets given the talent gap. Best-of-three format on hard courts often produces shorter matches when o...
Given Volynets' advantage, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome. While Sawangkaew has shown flashes of brilliance, sustainin...
Given Volynets' slight edge and the potential for a competitive match, it's likely to go to three sets. While Volynets is favored, Sawangkae...
Both players are competitive at this level and rallies are typically extended, especially in a best-of-3 format. Sawangkaew's fighting spiri...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Katie Volynets
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Katie Volynets
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Katie Volynets
Claude Haiku 4.5
Katie Volynets
DeepSeek V3
Katie Volynets
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
43dcd98034f3b652…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 28 · 00:55 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31656,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Mananchaya Sawangkaew",
"home": "Katie Volynets"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.