Katie BoultervsCarol Young Suh Lee
CYAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Katie Boulter 5/5 models |
under 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Katie Boulter |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Katie Boulter Katie Boulter is a top-100 WTA player with consistent hard-court credentials, while Carol Young Suh Lee is a lower-ranked player without sig...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 In a best-of-three format (which is standard for WTA), Boulter's superior ranking and hard-court prowess suggest a straightforward victory i... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
83%
Katie Boulter |
68%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
83%
Katie Boulter Katie Boulter is a significantly higher-ranked player than Carol Young Suh Lee based on pre-2025 form. Boulter has shown strong hard-court r...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
under Boulter is expected to win in straight sets given the ranking gap. Women's US Open matches between mismatched players frequently end in unde... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
85%
Katie Boulter |
65%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Katie Boulter Based on training data, Katie Boulter is an established professional player with experience at Grand Slam events and a competitive hard-cour...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 sets Given Katie Boulter's assumed superior experience and ranking against an unknown opponent, she is expected to control the match and likely w... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
80%
Katie Boulter |
70%
Carol Young Suh Lee |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
Katie Boulter Katie Boulter is a significantly higher-ranked and more accomplished player on the WTA tour, with multiple titles and a career-high ranking...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Carol Young Suh Lee Given the significant mismatch in player quality and experience, Katie Boulter is expected to win this match comfortably in straight sets. W...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
82%
Katie Boulter |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Katie Boulter Based on my training data through early 2025, Katie Boulter is a top-50 player with significant experience on hard courts, while Carol Young...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Boulter's expected dominance over a less experienced opponent, a straight-sets victory is the most likely outcome. In Grand Slams, top... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKatie Boulter 5/5
Katie Boulter is a top-100 WTA player with consistent hard-court credentials, while Carol Young Suh Lee is a lower-ranked player without sig...
Katie Boulter is a significantly higher-ranked player than Carol Young Suh Lee based on pre-2025 form. Boulter has shown strong hard-court r...
Based on training data, Katie Boulter is an established professional player with experience at Grand Slam events and a competitive hard-cour...
Katie Boulter is a significantly higher-ranked and more accomplished player on the WTA tour, with multiple titles and a career-high ranking...
Based on my training data through early 2025, Katie Boulter is a top-50 player with significant experience on hard courts, while Carol Young...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 3/10
In a best-of-three format (which is standard for WTA), Boulter's superior ranking and hard-court prowess suggest a straightforward victory i...
Boulter is expected to win in straight sets given the ranking gap. Women's US Open matches between mismatched players frequently end in unde...
Given Katie Boulter's assumed superior experience and ranking against an unknown opponent, she is expected to control the match and likely w...
Given the significant mismatch in player quality and experience, Katie Boulter is expected to win this match comfortably in straight sets. W...
Given Boulter's expected dominance over a less experienced opponent, a straight-sets victory is the most likely outcome. In Grand Slams, top...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Katie Boulter
Grok 4 Fast
Katie Boulter
DeepSeek V3
Katie Boulter
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Katie Boulter
Claude Haiku 4.5
Katie Boulter
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
5e98cdd7444a628f…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 21:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31803,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Carol Young Suh Lee",
"home": "Katie Boulter"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.