Katherine SebovvsJulia Avdeeva
JAYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Katherine Sebov 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Katherine Sebov |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Katherine Sebov Katherine Sebov is the higher-ranked player and has demonstrated more consistent performances on hard courts, which is the US Open surface....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are competitive enough that a straight-set victory is unlikely; Sebov's edge is modest, and Avdeeva should take at least one se... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Katherine Sebov |
58%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Katherine Sebov Training data through 2024. Katherine Sebov is the home player on hard courts at the US Open and has shown solid movement on this surface in...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under_2.5 Training data through 2024. Both players are lower-ranked and likely to produce shorter matches on outdoor hard courts. Serve and return sta... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Katherine Sebov |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Katherine Sebov Based on historical profiles from training data (up to 2024), both players operate at a similar level on hard courts. Sebov has shown a slig...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Given that both players are closely matched according to available historical data and both are comfortable on hard courts, the likelihood o... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Katherine Sebov |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Katherine Sebov Based on my training data, Katherine Sebov has a slightly better historical performance and is predicted to have a higher probability of win...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The head-to-head history and general player performance suggest a match that could go to three sets. Predicting 'over' accounts for the poss... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
70%
Katherine Sebov |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Katherine Sebov Based on my training data through 2025-09, Katherine Sebov has generally competed at a higher level on hard courts, with a stronger serve an...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Given the competitive nature of first-round Grand Slam matches and the relative skill levels, there is a slight lean toward a three-set matc... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKatherine Sebov 5/5
Katherine Sebov is the higher-ranked player and has demonstrated more consistent performances on hard courts, which is the US Open surface....
Training data through 2024. Katherine Sebov is the home player on hard courts at the US Open and has shown solid movement on this surface in...
Based on historical profiles from training data (up to 2024), both players operate at a similar level on hard courts. Sebov has shown a slig...
Based on my training data, Katherine Sebov has a slightly better historical performance and is predicted to have a higher probability of win...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, Katherine Sebov has generally competed at a higher level on hard courts, with a stronger serve an...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Both players are competitive enough that a straight-set victory is unlikely; Sebov's edge is modest, and Avdeeva should take at least one se...
Training data through 2024. Both players are lower-ranked and likely to produce shorter matches on outdoor hard courts. Serve and return sta...
Given that both players are closely matched according to available historical data and both are comfortable on hard courts, the likelihood o...
The head-to-head history and general player performance suggest a match that could go to three sets. Predicting 'over' accounts for the poss...
Given the competitive nature of first-round Grand Slam matches and the relative skill levels, there is a slight lean toward a three-set matc...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Katherine Sebov
Claude Haiku 4.5
Katherine Sebov
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Katherine Sebov
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Katherine Sebov
Grok 4 Fast
Katherine Sebov
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
3a5c9d5ab0f7d0ec…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Aug 25 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30811,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-25T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Julia Avdeeva",
"home": "Katherine Sebov"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.