Katarzyna KawavsEkaterine Gorgodze
EGYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 2/10 models |
Katarzyna Kawa 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Katarzyna Kawa |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players, if relatively evenly matched, tend to push matches into competitive three-set affairs on hard court where serve-and-volley ral...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Katarzyna Kawa Kawa is a Polish hard-court specialist with solid baseline consistency and experience on the US Open hard surface; Gorgodze, a Georgian play... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
under_22.5 |
58%
Katarzyna Kawa |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_22.5 Lower-ranked hard-court encounters between these profiles often stay below 23 total games when one player controls rallies. Limited serve po...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Katarzyna Kawa Katarzyna Kawa holds a modest edge on hard courts based on pre-2026 results and surface-specific movement. Ekaterine Gorgodze has shown inco... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Over 2.5 Sets |
55%
Katarzyna Kawa |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Sets Given the competitive nature expected between these two players, who are often closely matched in performance, it is likely the match will e...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Katarzyna Kawa Based on general career performance from my training data, Katarzyna Kawa often navigates qualifying rounds and performs creditably against... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
over |
55%
Katarzyna Kawa |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar caliber on hard courts. Both players have the ability to win...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Katarzyna Kawa Katarzyna Kawa is the higher-ranked player and has a better recent record on hard courts. Gorgodze has struggled for consistent wins in rece... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over_2.5 |
65%
Katarzyna Kawa |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 While Kawa is favored, Gorgodze is a capable competitor who can push matches to three sets, especially in Grand Slam conditions where player...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Katarzyna Kawa Based on training data through mid-2025, Katarzyna Kawa has generally been ranked higher and has more experience on hard courts, the surface... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Both players, if relatively evenly matched, tend to push matches into competitive three-set affairs on hard court where serve-and-volley ral...
Lower-ranked hard-court encounters between these profiles often stay below 23 total games when one player controls rallies. Limited serve po...
Given the competitive nature expected between these two players, who are often closely matched in performance, it is likely the match will e...
This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar caliber on hard courts. Both players have the ability to win...
While Kawa is favored, Gorgodze is a capable competitor who can push matches to three sets, especially in Grand Slam conditions where player...
Match winner
ConsensusKatarzyna Kawa 5/5
Kawa is a Polish hard-court specialist with solid baseline consistency and experience on the US Open hard surface; Gorgodze, a Georgian play...
Katarzyna Kawa holds a modest edge on hard courts based on pre-2026 results and surface-specific movement. Ekaterine Gorgodze has shown inco...
Based on general career performance from my training data, Katarzyna Kawa often navigates qualifying rounds and performs creditably against...
Katarzyna Kawa is the higher-ranked player and has a better recent record on hard courts. Gorgodze has struggled for consistent wins in rece...
Based on training data through mid-2025, Katarzyna Kawa has generally been ranked higher and has more experience on hard courts, the surface...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Katarzyna Kawa
Claude Haiku 4.5
Katarzyna Kawa
Grok 4 Fast
Katarzyna Kawa
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Katarzyna Kawa
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Katarzyna Kawa
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
e57787e6d8ae1254…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 21:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30816,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T21:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Ekaterine Gorgodze",
"home": "Katarzyna Kawa"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.