Karolina PliskovavsHanne Vandewinkel
HVAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Karolina Pliskova 5/5 models |
2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Karolina Pliskova |
65%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Karolina Pliskova Pliskova is a former US Open finalist (2016) with extensive hard-court experience and a powerful serve that translates well to the US Open's...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 Although Pliskova is favored, Vandewinkel will likely compete hard in at least one set given the competitive nature of US Open early rounds.... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
81%
Karolina Pliskova |
67%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
81%
Karolina Pliskova Karolina Pliskova holds a massive experience and hard-court pedigree advantage over the young qualifier Hanne Vandewinkel at a Grand Slam. T...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
67%
under_2.5 Best-of-three format at the US Open favors the higher-ranked player finishing in straight sets. Pliskova's serve historically limits opponen... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
80%
Karolina Pliskova |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
Karolina Pliskova This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update, as live access for a future event in August 2026 is unavailable. Karolina...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update. Given Karolina Pliskova's historical dominance over lower-ranked opponent... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Karolina Pliskova |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Karolina Pliskova Karolina Pliskova is a highly experienced player with a strong track record on hard courts, including a US Open final appearance. Hanne Vand...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 While Pliskova is favored, Vandewinkel is capable of taking a set against a top player, especially in the early rounds of a Grand Slam. Plis... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Karolina Pliskova |
60%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Karolina Pliskova Karolina Pliskova is a former world No.1 and a seasoned hard court player, while Hanne Vandewinkel is largely unproven at this level. Plisko...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over 2.5 Pliskova is known to sometimes lose focus and drop sets against lower-ranked opponents, especially when her serve is broken early. Vandewink... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKarolina Pliskova 5/5
Pliskova is a former US Open finalist (2016) with extensive hard-court experience and a powerful serve that translates well to the US Open's...
Karolina Pliskova holds a massive experience and hard-court pedigree advantage over the young qualifier Hanne Vandewinkel at a Grand Slam. T...
This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update, as live access for a future event in August 2026 is unavailable. Karolina...
Karolina Pliskova is a highly experienced player with a strong track record on hard courts, including a US Open final appearance. Hanne Vand...
Karolina Pliskova is a former world No.1 and a seasoned hard court player, while Hanne Vandewinkel is largely unproven at this level. Plisko...
Over / Under
Consensus2.5 1/10
Although Pliskova is favored, Vandewinkel will likely compete hard in at least one set given the competitive nature of US Open early rounds....
Best-of-three format at the US Open favors the higher-ranked player finishing in straight sets. Pliskova's serve historically limits opponen...
This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update. Given Karolina Pliskova's historical dominance over lower-ranked opponent...
While Pliskova is favored, Vandewinkel is capable of taking a set against a top player, especially in the early rounds of a Grand Slam. Plis...
Pliskova is known to sometimes lose focus and drop sets against lower-ranked opponents, especially when her serve is broken early. Vandewink...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Karolina Pliskova
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Karolina Pliskova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Karolina Pliskova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Karolina Pliskova
DeepSeek V3
Karolina Pliskova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
34694f0d1e699b0b…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 19:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31763,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Hanne Vandewinkel",
"home": "Karolina Pliskova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.