Kansas City Royals vs Tampa Bay Rays
Kickoff · Tue, Jun 30 · 23:40 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
2764a1ff0b019b40…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Jun 30 · 23:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 7810,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-30T23:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Tampa Bay Rays",
"home": "Kansas City Royals"
},
"version": "v1",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Kansas City Royals |
58%
Under 8.5 |
52%
Kansas City Royals -1.5 |
56%
Under 4.5 |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Kansas City Royals Both teams are competitive mid-tier MLB franchises as of my training data (through April 2025). The Royals have shown modest home-field adva...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 8.5 Tampa Bay has historically deployed elite pitching as a competitive advantage, while Kansas City's offenses have often been streaky. Late Ju...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Kansas City Royals -1.5 Home-field advantage typically yields 1–1.5 runs in the spread market. The Royals' historically balanced roster and Tampa's reliance on pitc...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Under 4.5 First-five-inning totals typically reflect early-game pitcher dominance and cold bats. Tampa Bay's traditional strength in starting pitching...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
65%
Tampa Bay Rays |
55%
over |
60%
Tampa Bay Rays |
60%
Tampa Bay Rays |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Tampa Bay Rays The Tampa Bay Rays have demonstrated superior performance metrics compared to the Kansas City Royals in recent matchups, including a higher...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown tendencies to engage in high-scoring games, with recent matchups often exceeding 9.5 total runs. The offensive capabil...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Tampa Bay Rays The Tampa Bay Rays have consistently outperformed the Kansas City Royals by more than 1.5 runs in recent encounters, indicating a strong lik...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
Tampa Bay Rays The Tampa Bay Rays have demonstrated strong early-game performance, often leading after the first five innings in recent matchups against th...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Royals |
51%
over |
52%
Royals -1.5 |
52%
Royals |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Royals Home field advantage gives Kansas City a slight edge in this matchup. Both teams have historically been middle-of-the-pack clubs with simila...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Typical MLB scoring environments favor the over slightly in neutral weather. Rays and Royals offenses have shown moderate run production in...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Royals -1.5 Home status and minor historical edge support a small Royals run-line lean. Run differentials between these clubs are usually narrow. Traini...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Royals Early-game home advantage and typical bullpen usage patterns give the Royals a modest edge through five innings. Matchups in this series hav...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Tampa Bay Rays |
53%
Under 8.5 |
59%
Kansas City Royals +1.5 |
38%
Tampa Bay Rays |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Tampa Bay Rays Based on historical team profiles from training data (through early 2024), the Tampa Bay Rays generally demonstrate a higher level of consis...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Under 8.5 Historically, the Rays tend to have solid pitching which can suppress opponent scoring, while their offense, though effective, isn't always...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
59%
Kansas City Royals +1.5 Baseball games are frequently decided by narrow margins, and home teams often keep games close even against stronger opponents. Based on gen...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
38%
Tampa Bay Rays The Tampa Bay Rays historically emphasize strong starting pitching and efficient early-game offense, according to my training data through e...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Tampa Bay Rays |
52%
over |
53%
Tampa Bay Rays |
— |
51%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Tampa Bay Rays Based on training data, the Tampa Bay Rays generally have a stronger historical performance and pitching advantage over the Kansas City Roya...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Given the general offensive capabilities and pitching matchups typical in MLB, a total of 7.5 runs leans slightly towards the over. Without...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Tampa Bay Rays The spread of -1.5 often implies a slight favorite to win by a margin. Given the perceived historical edge of the Rays, they are slightly mo...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
51%
over Predicting the first five innings is heavily dependent on starting pitchers. Without this information, and relying on general MLB trends, a... |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Tampa Bay Rays |
52%
Over 8.5 |
28%
Tampa Bay Rays -1.5 |
50%
Kansas City Royals |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Tampa Bay Rays The Rays have a stronger overall roster and better recent form, but the Royals have home-field advantage. Historical head-to-head is fairly...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Both teams have offenses that can score, and Kauffman Stadium is slightly hitter-friendly. However, starting pitchers are unknown; relying o...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
28%
Tampa Bay Rays -1.5 Run lines are difficult to predict without confirmed lineups. Given parity in training data, the Royals covering the +1.5 is more likely tha...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Kansas City Royals First five innings often depend on starting pitchers, who are unknown. Without information, this is a coin flip; slight home field advantage...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Consensus |
Tampa Bay Rays 4/6 |
over 3/6 |
Tampa Bay Rays 2/6 |
Tampa Bay Rays 2/5 |
over 1/1 |
|
Match winner
ConsensusTampa Bay Rays 4/6
Both teams are competitive mid-tier MLB franchises as of my training data (through April 2025). The Royals have shown modest home-field adva...
The Tampa Bay Rays have demonstrated superior performance metrics compared to the Kansas City Royals in recent matchups, including a higher...
Home field advantage gives Kansas City a slight edge in this matchup. Both teams have historically been middle-of-the-pack clubs with simila...
Based on historical team profiles from training data (through early 2024), the Tampa Bay Rays generally demonstrate a higher level of consis...
Based on training data, the Tampa Bay Rays generally have a stronger historical performance and pitching advantage over the Kansas City Roya...
The Rays have a stronger overall roster and better recent form, but the Royals have home-field advantage. Historical head-to-head is fairly...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Tampa Bay has historically deployed elite pitching as a competitive advantage, while Kansas City's offenses have often been streaky. Late Ju...
Both teams have shown tendencies to engage in high-scoring games, with recent matchups often exceeding 9.5 total runs. The offensive capabil...
Typical MLB scoring environments favor the over slightly in neutral weather. Rays and Royals offenses have shown moderate run production in...
Historically, the Rays tend to have solid pitching which can suppress opponent scoring, while their offense, though effective, isn't always...
Given the general offensive capabilities and pitching matchups typical in MLB, a total of 7.5 runs leans slightly towards the over. Without...
Both teams have offenses that can score, and Kauffman Stadium is slightly hitter-friendly. However, starting pitchers are unknown; relying o...
Spread
ConsensusTampa Bay Rays 2/6
Home-field advantage typically yields 1–1.5 runs in the spread market. The Royals' historically balanced roster and Tampa's reliance on pitc...
The Tampa Bay Rays have consistently outperformed the Kansas City Royals by more than 1.5 runs in recent encounters, indicating a strong lik...
Home status and minor historical edge support a small Royals run-line lean. Run differentials between these clubs are usually narrow. Traini...
Baseball games are frequently decided by narrow margins, and home teams often keep games close even against stronger opponents. Based on gen...
The spread of -1.5 often implies a slight favorite to win by a margin. Given the perceived historical edge of the Rays, they are slightly mo...
Run lines are difficult to predict without confirmed lineups. Given parity in training data, the Royals covering the +1.5 is more likely tha...
First 5 innings
ConsensusTampa Bay Rays 2/5
First-five-inning totals typically reflect early-game pitcher dominance and cold bats. Tampa Bay's traditional strength in starting pitching...
The Tampa Bay Rays have demonstrated strong early-game performance, often leading after the first five innings in recent matchups against th...
Early-game home advantage and typical bullpen usage patterns give the Royals a modest edge through five innings. Matchups in this series hav...
The Tampa Bay Rays historically emphasize strong starting pitching and efficient early-game offense, according to my training data through e...
First five innings often depend on starting pitchers, who are unknown. Without information, this is a coin flip; slight home field advantage...
First five innings over 4.5
Consensusover 1/1
Predicting the first five innings is heavily dependent on starting pitchers. Without this information, and relying on general MLB trends, a...
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.