Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 6–5
Kansas City Royals logo

Kansas City RoyalsvsSt.Louis Cardinals

St.Louis Cardinals logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final6–5 Locked 24picks · 14 graded AIs split
Recap Consensus missed

Kansas City Royals 6–5 St.Louis Cardinals

3 of 6 AIs leaned St.Louis Cardinals — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
St.Louis Cardinals 3/6
Correct calls
3/6
Final
6–5

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
St.Louis Cardinals 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Kansas City Royals W

The Royals are slight home favorites with the benefit of playing at Kauffman Stadium. Without access to live 2026 roster data, injury report...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% St.Louis Cardinals L

The St. Louis Cardinals have shown a strong performance recently, winning 11 of their last 16 games. In contrast, the Kansas City Royals hav...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Kansas City Royals W

Training data through 2025-09 shows the Royals with a slight home edge in interleague play against the Cardinals. Both clubs typically finis...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% St.Louis Cardinals L

Based on historical MLB trends and general team strengths from training data through late 2025, the St. Louis Cardinals are often a more con...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% St.Louis Cardinals L

Based on general MLB trends and team strengths from my training data, the St. Louis Cardinals typically hold an advantage over the Kansas Ci...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Kansas City Royals W

The Royals have been competitive at home with a balanced lineup, while the Cardinals struggle on the road. Close matchup, but slight home ed...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Spread

Consensus
St.Louis Cardinals 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% Kansas City Royals -1

The Royals as home favorites in a standard matchup typically open around -1 to -1.5 runs. This reflects modest home-field edge and the lack...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% St.Louis Cardinals L

The Cardinals' recent form and home advantage suggest they are likely to win by at least one run. Their improved performance and the Royals'...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 48% home_ -1.5

Training data through 2025-09 shows the Royals cover the run line at home roughly 48 percent of the time against comparable opponents. Cardi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Kansas City Royals +1.5 W

Despite leaning towards the Cardinals for a straight win, I anticipate this to be a close game given it's a rivalry matchup and the Royals a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% St.Louis Cardinals L

Given the slight edge predicted for the Cardinals in head-to-head, they are marginally more likely to cover a -1.5 run line. This prediction...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 30% Kansas City Royals -1.5 L

Close game likely; Royals are only slight favorites and covering by two runs is a stretch. Cardinals often keep games close. Training data t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Under 8.5

Without current pitcher matchup data, bullpen health, or 2026 offensive statistics, this prediction defaults to mid-range MLB run scoring. T...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over W

Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, with the Cardinals averaging 4.3 runs per game and the Royals averaging 3.8 runs per...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Training data through 2025-09 indicates average run scoring in Royals home games hovers near the league mean. Weather and park factors are n...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under L

Without specific pitching matchups for 2026, I'm assuming average MLB starting pitching for both teams, and set the line at a common 8.5 run...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over W

MLB games, particularly with offenses that can show up, frequently trend towards higher run totals. Without specific pitching matchups or li...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5 W

Both bullpens have been inconsistent, and the hitter-friendly Kauffman Stadium could boost scoring. Expect moderate scoring environment. Tra...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

First 5 innings

Consensus
St.Louis Cardinals 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 4.5

Early-inning totals in baseball typically track 1–2 runs below full-game totals due to slower scoring pace and fresh pitching. A Saturday ni...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% St.Louis Cardinals

The Cardinals' recent pitching performances and home advantage suggest they are likely to lead after the first five innings. Their improved...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Kansas City Royals

Training data through 2025-09 gives the home side a modest edge in the opening five innings due to starter matchups. Late-inning volatility...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% St.Louis Cardinals

The First Five Innings market heavily relies on the starting pitchers and early lineup performance. Given the Cardinals' historical depth an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% St.Louis Cardinals

The Cardinals' general tendency to start games strong, coupled with the slight advantage projected, makes them a marginally better pick for...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Kansas City Royals

Royals starting rotation has been reliable early in games, while Cardinals have had slow starts offensively. Slight edge for Kansas City in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

St.Louis Cardinals

65
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Kansas City Royals

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

St.Louis Cardinals

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Kansas City Royals

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Kansas City Royals

53
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

St.Louis Cardinals

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 907b418ae556b3dc…
Kickoff
Sat, Jun 20 · 00:15 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 4347,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-20T00:15:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:15:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "St.Louis Cardinals",
        "home": "Kansas City Royals"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-16T06:16:47+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →