Kansas City RoyalsvsMinnesota Twins
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 4/6 models |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 3/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 5/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 2/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
52%
Over 8.5 |
48%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
50%
Over 4.5 (First 5 Innings) |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Combined scoring over the last 5 matches: Royals 39 + Twins 28 = 67 runs across 10 team-games, averaging 6.7 runs per team per match. At a 1...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Minnesota's recent form edge (4W-1L) and tighter defense (16 runs in 5 games) support a -1.5 lean, but the margin is thin. KC's volatile sco...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota enters with superior recent form (4W-1L vs KC's 3W-2L over the last 5 matches) and a stronger run-differential (+12 vs +12, nearly...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Over 4.5 (First 5 Innings) Early-game scoring is highly dependent on starter quality and lineup handedness matchups, neither of which are confirmed. Royals have strong... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
over |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, and the game is expected to have a total score exceeding 2.5 runs.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' superior record and recent form suggest they will cover the -1 spread against the Royals.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have a stronger overall record and have been more consistent in recent matchups against the Royals. Their superior perfo...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins The Twins are expected to have a strong start in the first five innings, leveraging their overall advantage over the Royals.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
over |
51%
Kansas City Royals |
53%
Kansas City Royals |
50%
Kansas City Royals |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams recent games show elevated run totals especially Royals. Outdoor venue in August typically favors hitters. Training data through...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Kansas City Royals Home field and recent scoring give Royals slight spread value. Twins strong but long rest may affect sharpness. Training data through 2024-1...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Kansas City Royals Royals have scored more in recent form and benefit from home advantage at Kauffman. Twins recent results are strong but road environment red...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Kansas City Royals Early innings often decided by starters but no specific matchup data. Home park factor slight lean to Royals. Training data through 2024-10... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
over |
51%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
54%
Minnesota Twins |
40%
Minnesota Twins F5 |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Assuming a typical MLB totals line of 8.5, the combined abstract run scoring and conceding for both teams (Twins 28 scored/16 conceded; Roya...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Given the slight H2H favoritism towards the Minnesota Twins, picking them to cover a standard -1.5 run line is reasonable. Baseball games of...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Minnesota Twins Based on historical performance trends in my training data, the Minnesota Twins generally hold a slight edge over the Kansas City Royals. Wh...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
40%
Minnesota Twins F5 The first five innings outcome heavily depends on starting pitcher matchups, which are unknown for this future date. Projecting based on gen... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
over |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
57%
over |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over The weather forecast for Kansas City indicates warm temperatures and a light breeze, which can aid in ball carry. Both teams have shown dece...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Minnesota Twins Given the slight edge to the Twins in head-to-head matchup and the potential for a moderate-scoring game, a close contest is expected. The T...
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins Both teams have had similar recent form, but the Minnesota Twins' away form has been slightly better. Without specific starting pitcher info...
2 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
57%
over With potential for early offense from both teams and favorable weather conditions, the first five innings are likely to see more runs scored...
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Over |
51%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over Recent team totals are high: Twins scored 28 over five games, Royals 39, indicating strong offenses. Kauffman Stadium tends to play hitter-f...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Twins have been winning decisively (four wins, run differential +12 over five games), indicating ability to win by 2+. Royals have been inco...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins Twins have won four of their last five, scoring consistently with strong run production. Kansas City are erratic, losing twice recent despit...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Minnesota Twins Starting pitching matchup heavily influences the first five frames, and while neither starter is elite, the Twins' rotation has been steadie... |
|||||
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/6
Combined scoring over the last 5 matches: Royals 39 + Twins 28 = 67 runs across 10 team-games, averaging 6.7 runs per team per match. At a 1...
Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, and the game is expected to have a total score exceeding 2.5 runs.
Both teams recent games show elevated run totals especially Royals. Outdoor venue in August typically favors hitters. Training data through...
Assuming a typical MLB totals line of 8.5, the combined abstract run scoring and conceding for both teams (Twins 28 scored/16 conceded; Roya...
The weather forecast for Kansas City indicates warm temperatures and a light breeze, which can aid in ball carry. Both teams have shown dece...
Recent team totals are high: Twins scored 28 over five games, Royals 39, indicating strong offenses. Kauffman Stadium tends to play hitter-f...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins -1.5 3/6
Minnesota's recent form edge (4W-1L) and tighter defense (16 runs in 5 games) support a -1.5 lean, but the margin is thin. KC's volatile sco...
The Twins' superior record and recent form suggest they will cover the -1 spread against the Royals.
Home field and recent scoring give Royals slight spread value. Twins strong but long rest may affect sharpness. Training data through 2024-1...
Given the slight H2H favoritism towards the Minnesota Twins, picking them to cover a standard -1.5 run line is reasonable. Baseball games of...
Given the slight edge to the Twins in head-to-head matchup and the potential for a moderate-scoring game, a close contest is expected. The T...
Twins have been winning decisively (four wins, run differential +12 over five games), indicating ability to win by 2+. Royals have been inco...
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/6
Minnesota enters with superior recent form (4W-1L vs KC's 3W-2L over the last 5 matches) and a stronger run-differential (+12 vs +12, nearly...
The Minnesota Twins have a stronger overall record and have been more consistent in recent matchups against the Royals. Their superior perfo...
Royals have scored more in recent form and benefit from home advantage at Kauffman. Twins recent results are strong but road environment red...
Based on historical performance trends in my training data, the Minnesota Twins generally hold a slight edge over the Kansas City Royals. Wh...
Both teams have had similar recent form, but the Minnesota Twins' away form has been slightly better. Without specific starting pitcher info...
Twins have won four of their last five, scoring consistently with strong run production. Kansas City are erratic, losing twice recent despit...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 2/6
Early-game scoring is highly dependent on starter quality and lineup handedness matchups, neither of which are confirmed. Royals have strong...
The Twins are expected to have a strong start in the first five innings, leveraging their overall advantage over the Royals.
Early innings often decided by starters but no specific matchup data. Home park factor slight lean to Royals. Training data through 2024-10...
The first five innings outcome heavily depends on starting pitcher matchups, which are unknown for this future date. Projecting based on gen...
With potential for early offense from both teams and favorable weather conditions, the first five innings are likely to see more runs scored...
Starting pitching matchup heavily influences the first five frames, and while neither starter is elite, the Twins' rotation has been steadie...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-4o Mini
Minnesota Twins
Claude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Kansas City Royals
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
cd8571103d6b0318…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 6 · 23:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 20916,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Kauffman Stadium",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-08-06T23:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 06 Aug 2026 23:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Twins",
"home": "Kansas City Royals"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 39,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 27
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 28,
"home": 29
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.