Kansas City RoyalsvsMinnesota Twins
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 7 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First five innings over 4.0
?
First five innings over 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 3/6 models |
over 5/7 models |
Minnesota Twins 5/7 models |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 2/7 models |
over 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
54%
Over 8.5 |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
51%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins Early-game pitcher form and bullpen freshness heavily favor Minnesota, which has shown tighter overall pitching (16 RA in 5 games). Kansas C...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 8.5 KC has scored 39 runs in their last 5 matches (7.8 per game) and Minnesota 28 runs in 5 (5.6 per game), yielding a combined 13.4 runs per ga...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota enters with stronger recent form (4W-1L vs KC 3W-2L over last 5 matches) and a superior run differential (+12 vs +12 for KC, but T...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Minnesota's superior run differential and defensive tightness (16 runs conceded in 5 games) support laying a small spread despite the away l...
First five innings over 4.0
?
First five innings over 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
53%
away_lead |
62%
over |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
54%
away_cover |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
away_lead Early-game edge favors the Twins: Joe Ryan typically provides length and limits early damage, while Minnesota's top lineup can produce again...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over Kauffman Stadium's 2026 fence moves and park analyses point toward a more neutral-to-slightly-hitter friendly environment, and evening tempe...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota enters with the stronger overall roster and a proven mid-rotation ace in Joe Ryan (listed as the probable Twins starter), while KC...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
away_cover Twins' depth and Joe Ryan's ability to provide length give Minnesota a better chance to win by multiple runs than Kansas City, especially wh...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
First five innings over 4.0
?
First five innings over 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
over |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' consistent performance suggests they are more likely to lead after the first five innings, though the Royals could keep it close...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, and the game is expected to be competitive, leading to a higher probability of exceed...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have a stronger overall record and have been more consistent in recent games compared to the Kansas City Royals. Their s...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' superior overall performance and recent form suggest they are more likely to cover the -1 spread in this matchup.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First five innings over 4.0
?
First five innings over 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
50%
Kansas City Royals |
52%
over |
53%
Kansas City Royals |
51%
Kansas City Royals -1.5 |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Kansas City Royals Home team typically controls early innings at Kauffman. Twins recent form strong overall but Royals early offense noted in context. No speci...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both offenses have been productive lately with combined scoring averaging over 10 runs per game in recent matches. Outdoor venue and typical...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Kansas City Royals Royals have scored heavily in recent form at home while Twins recent results include a loss. Kauffman Stadium favors the home side in this m...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Kansas City Royals -1.5 Royals home scoring edge and recent home results support a small spread lean. Twins road form is strong but venue and rest parity favor Kans...
First five innings over 4.0
?
First five innings over 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
51%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Minnesota Twins The 'first five innings' market heavily relies on starting pitching, which is unavailable for this 2026 game. Based on the Twins' slightly s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over Assuming a standard line of 8.5 runs for this market, both teams have been involved in relatively high-scoring games recently, according to...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Minnesota Twins Based on my training data up to its last update, the Minnesota Twins display slightly better recent form (4W-1L) compared to the Kansas City...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 With the Twins showing slightly better recent form, they are marginally favored to cover a standard -1.5 run spread. While specific lineups...
First five innings over 4.0
?
First five innings over 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
— |
52%
over |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
51%
Minnesota Twins |
53%
over |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over The over is slightly favored due to the offensive potential of both teams and the fact that Kauffman Stadium can be a hitter-friendly enviro...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have a slight edge due to their more consistent starting pitching compared to the Kansas City Royals. While both teams h...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Minnesota Twins The spread is very tight, reflecting the close nature of the matchup. However, Minnesota's slightly more reliable pitching and consistent of...
3 sources cited
First five innings over 4.0
?
First five innings over 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
53%
over The first five innings are predicted to have slightly more than 4 runs. Both offenses have the capability to score early, and while the star...
3 sources cited
|
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
52%
Kansas City Royals |
53%
over |
55%
Kansas City Royals |
50%
Kansas City Royals |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Kansas City Royals Home teams tend to have a slight edge in early innings due to not batting in the bottom of first? Actually home teams bat last, which can be...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Kauffman Stadium is neutral for run scoring, but both teams have shown recent offensive production (Royals scored 39 in last 5, Twins 28). W...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Kansas City Royals Training data through 2025-09 suggests the Royals have a slight edge at home in this matchup. Both teams have similar rest and recent form,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Kansas City Royals Data is limited; I split the spread evenly between home and away. The game is likely close, and no strong edge exists in my training data. A...
First five innings over 4.0
?
First five innings over 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 3/6
Early-game pitcher form and bullpen freshness heavily favor Minnesota, which has shown tighter overall pitching (16 RA in 5 games). Kansas C...
Early-game edge favors the Twins: Joe Ryan typically provides length and limits early damage, while Minnesota's top lineup can produce again...
The Twins' consistent performance suggests they are more likely to lead after the first five innings, though the Royals could keep it close...
Home team typically controls early innings at Kauffman. Twins recent form strong overall but Royals early offense noted in context. No speci...
The 'first five innings' market heavily relies on starting pitching, which is unavailable for this 2026 game. Based on the Twins' slightly s...
Home teams tend to have a slight edge in early innings due to not batting in the bottom of first? Actually home teams bat last, which can be...
Over / Under
Consensusover 5/7
KC has scored 39 runs in their last 5 matches (7.8 per game) and Minnesota 28 runs in 5 (5.6 per game), yielding a combined 13.4 runs per ga...
Kauffman Stadium's 2026 fence moves and park analyses point toward a more neutral-to-slightly-hitter friendly environment, and evening tempe...
Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, and the game is expected to be competitive, leading to a higher probability of exceed...
Both offenses have been productive lately with combined scoring averaging over 10 runs per game in recent matches. Outdoor venue and typical...
Assuming a standard line of 8.5 runs for this market, both teams have been involved in relatively high-scoring games recently, according to...
The over is slightly favored due to the offensive potential of both teams and the fact that Kauffman Stadium can be a hitter-friendly enviro...
Kauffman Stadium is neutral for run scoring, but both teams have shown recent offensive production (Royals scored 39 in last 5, Twins 28). W...
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/7
Minnesota enters with stronger recent form (4W-1L vs KC 3W-2L over last 5 matches) and a superior run differential (+12 vs +12 for KC, but T...
Minnesota enters with the stronger overall roster and a proven mid-rotation ace in Joe Ryan (listed as the probable Twins starter), while KC...
The Minnesota Twins have a stronger overall record and have been more consistent in recent games compared to the Kansas City Royals. Their s...
Royals have scored heavily in recent form at home while Twins recent results include a loss. Kauffman Stadium favors the home side in this m...
Based on my training data up to its last update, the Minnesota Twins display slightly better recent form (4W-1L) compared to the Kansas City...
The Minnesota Twins have a slight edge due to their more consistent starting pitching compared to the Kansas City Royals. While both teams h...
Training data through 2025-09 suggests the Royals have a slight edge at home in this matchup. Both teams have similar rest and recent form,...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins -1.5 2/7
Minnesota's superior run differential and defensive tightness (16 runs conceded in 5 games) support laying a small spread despite the away l...
Twins' depth and Joe Ryan's ability to provide length give Minnesota a better chance to win by multiple runs than Kansas City, especially wh...
The Twins' superior overall performance and recent form suggest they are more likely to cover the -1 spread in this matchup.
Royals home scoring edge and recent home results support a small spread lean. Twins road form is strong but venue and rest parity favor Kans...
With the Twins showing slightly better recent form, they are marginally favored to cover a standard -1.5 run spread. While specific lineups...
The spread is very tight, reflecting the close nature of the matchup. However, Minnesota's slightly more reliable pitching and consistent of...
Data is limited; I split the spread evenly between home and away. The game is likely close, and no strong edge exists in my training data. A...
First five innings over 4.0
Consensusover 1/1
The first five innings are predicted to have slightly more than 4 runs. Both offenses have the capability to score early, and while the star...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-4o Mini
Minnesota Twins
Claude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
GPT-5 Mini
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Kansas City Royals
Grok 4 Fast
Kansas City Royals
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a133f20345ee000d…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Aug 4 · 23:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 20130,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Kauffman Stadium",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-08-04T23:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 04 Aug 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Twins",
"home": "Kansas City Royals"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 39,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 27
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 27,
"home": 27
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
40 tool calls · 5 sources
5 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.