Kamilla RakhimovavsOksana Selekhmeteva
OSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Kamilla Rakhimova 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Kamilla Rakhimova |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Kamilla Rakhimova Both players are mid-ranking WTA competitors with limited head-to-head history. Rakhimova, a Kazakh player, has shown slightly more consiste...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Women's singles matches at US Open are best-of-three sets, so the market totals 2.5 refers to whether the match goes to a third set (over =... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Kamilla Rakhimova |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Kamilla Rakhimova Rakhimova holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results from training data through 2025. Selekhmeteva has shown inconsistency on ou...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Rakhimova's superior serve and break-point conversion on hard courts should produce a straight-sets win. Both players lack the sustained pow... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Kamilla Rakhimova |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Kamilla Rakhimova Based on training data up to my last update, Kamilla Rakhimova typically demonstrates more experience and a higher ranking on the WTA tour c...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets Even with Rakhimova as the favorite, Grand Slam matches often see competitive play, and Selekhmeteva has the potential to challenge and take... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Kamilla Rakhimova |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Kamilla Rakhimova Based on training data, Kamilla Rakhimova has a slight edge due to her generally more consistent performance and aggressive style on hard co...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar caliber. A three-set match is likely, pushing the total sets... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Kamilla Rakhimova |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Kamilla Rakhimova With no live data available, I rely on training knowledge through early 2025. Rakhimova has been more consistent on hard courts, and Selekhm...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both players are competitive and have had close matches in the past, suggesting a three-set battle. Their previous two encounters both went... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKamilla Rakhimova 5/5
Both players are mid-ranking WTA competitors with limited head-to-head history. Rakhimova, a Kazakh player, has shown slightly more consiste...
Rakhimova holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results from training data through 2025. Selekhmeteva has shown inconsistency on ou...
Based on training data up to my last update, Kamilla Rakhimova typically demonstrates more experience and a higher ranking on the WTA tour c...
Based on training data, Kamilla Rakhimova has a slight edge due to her generally more consistent performance and aggressive style on hard co...
With no live data available, I rely on training knowledge through early 2025. Rakhimova has been more consistent on hard courts, and Selekhm...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Women's singles matches at US Open are best-of-three sets, so the market totals 2.5 refers to whether the match goes to a third set (over =...
Rakhimova's superior serve and break-point conversion on hard courts should produce a straight-sets win. Both players lack the sustained pow...
Even with Rakhimova as the favorite, Grand Slam matches often see competitive play, and Selekhmeteva has the potential to challenge and take...
This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar caliber. A three-set match is likely, pushing the total sets...
Both players are competitive and have had close matches in the past, suggesting a three-set battle. Their previous two encounters both went...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Kamilla Rakhimova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Kamilla Rakhimova
Grok 4 Fast
Kamilla Rakhimova
DeepSeek V3
Kamilla Rakhimova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Kamilla Rakhimova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
9fa520f3c9d2399c…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 2 · 18:50 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35133,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-02T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Oksana Selekhmeteva",
"home": "Kamilla Rakhimova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.