Kamil MajchrzakvsValentin Vacherot
VVAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Kamil Majchrzak 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Kamil Majchrzak |
58%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Kamil Majchrzak Majchrzak is a Polish professional ranked in the top 100 with proven hard-court pedigree and multiple ATP-level wins; Vacherot is a French q...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 Majchrzak is favored and should win, but the question is how many sets. Vacherot, as a lower-ranked challenger player, is unlikely to win mo... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Kamil Majchrzak |
62%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Kamil Majchrzak Majchrzak holds the higher ranking and stronger hard-court results from prior seasons. Vacherot lacks the experience to challenge consistent...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 3.5 Majchrzak expected to control rallies on hard with serve advantage. Lower-ranked opponent unlikely to force five sets. Training data through... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
57%
Kamil Majchrzak |
62%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
57%
Kamil Majchrzak Based on my training data up to late 2025, Kamil Majchrzak generally has more Grand Slam main draw experience and a slightly higher career p...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 3.5 Given that both players are competitive and capable on hard courts, it's unlikely to be a straightforward straight-sets victory for either s... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Kamil Majchrzak |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Kamil Majchrzak Based on training data up to 2025, Kamil Majchrzak has shown a more consistent performance on hard courts compared to Valentin Vacherot. Maj...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given that both players are competitive on hard courts, this match is expected to be closely contested. The slight edge for Majchrzak sugges... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
70%
Kamil Majchrzak |
60%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Kamil Majchrzak Based on training data through 2025-09, Majchrzak has more Grand Slam experience and a higher career-high ranking than Vacherot. Hard courts...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 3.5 Majchrzak is favored to win in straight sets or four sets, given his superior experience and skill on hard courts. Vacherot may struggle to... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKamil Majchrzak 5/5
Majchrzak is a Polish professional ranked in the top 100 with proven hard-court pedigree and multiple ATP-level wins; Vacherot is a French q...
Majchrzak holds the higher ranking and stronger hard-court results from prior seasons. Vacherot lacks the experience to challenge consistent...
Based on my training data up to late 2025, Kamil Majchrzak generally has more Grand Slam main draw experience and a slightly higher career p...
Based on training data up to 2025, Kamil Majchrzak has shown a more consistent performance on hard courts compared to Valentin Vacherot. Maj...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Majchrzak has more Grand Slam experience and a higher career-high ranking than Vacherot. Hard courts...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Majchrzak is favored and should win, but the question is how many sets. Vacherot, as a lower-ranked challenger player, is unlikely to win mo...
Majchrzak expected to control rallies on hard with serve advantage. Lower-ranked opponent unlikely to force five sets. Training data through...
Given that both players are competitive and capable on hard courts, it's unlikely to be a straightforward straight-sets victory for either s...
Given that both players are competitive on hard courts, this match is expected to be closely contested. The slight edge for Majchrzak sugges...
Majchrzak is favored to win in straight sets or four sets, given his superior experience and skill on hard courts. Vacherot may struggle to...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Kamil Majchrzak
Grok 4 Fast
Kamil Majchrzak
Claude Haiku 4.5
Kamil Majchrzak
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Kamil Majchrzak
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Kamil Majchrzak
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a9db4b8352f7c354…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 2 · 23:25 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35126,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-02T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Valentin Vacherot",
"home": "Kamil Majchrzak"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.