Jurij RodionovvsFrederico Ferreira Silva
FFAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Jurij Rodionov 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Jurij Rodionov |
57%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Jurij Rodionov Rodionov is an Austrian left-hander ranked in the top 200 with solid hard-court form and a serve-based game that translates well to US Open...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
Over 2.5 Rodionov vs Ferreira Silva carries moderate disparity in ranking and hard-court experience, but Ferreira Silva's scrappy style and potential... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
67%
Jurij Rodionov |
58%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
67%
Jurij Rodionov Jurij Rodionov holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results from training data through 2025. Frederico Ferreira Silva has struggle...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over 3.5 Best-of-five format at the US Open favors longer matches for players of this level. Both competitors show solid serve stats on hard but inco... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
62%
Jurij Rodionov |
55%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Jurij Rodionov Based on historical performance and training data (up to my last update), Jurij Rodionov generally possesses a more aggressive game suited f...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 Sets Given the US Open main draw is best-of-five sets, and both players are established professionals, a competitive match is likely. While Rodio... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Frederico Ferreira Silva |
58%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Frederico Ferreira Silva Jurij Rodionov is the higher-ranked player and has demonstrated more consistent performance on the ATP Challenger Tour. Federico Ferreira Si...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over While Rodionov is favored, Ferreira Silva is capable of winning sets, especially in the early stages of a Grand Slam if he plays with freedo...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Jurij Rodionov |
50%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Jurij Rodionov Based on training data through mid-2025, Rodionov has been more consistent on hard courts and possesses a stronger serve, which suits the US...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
50%
over_3.5 Both players are evenly matched in terms of overall level, and five-set matches often extend when neither has a clear edge. Ferreira Silva's... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusJurij Rodionov 4/5
Rodionov is an Austrian left-hander ranked in the top 200 with solid hard-court form and a serve-based game that translates well to US Open...
Jurij Rodionov holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results from training data through 2025. Frederico Ferreira Silva has struggle...
Based on historical performance and training data (up to my last update), Jurij Rodionov generally possesses a more aggressive game suited f...
Jurij Rodionov is the higher-ranked player and has demonstrated more consistent performance on the ATP Challenger Tour. Federico Ferreira Si...
Based on training data through mid-2025, Rodionov has been more consistent on hard courts and possesses a stronger serve, which suits the US...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Rodionov vs Ferreira Silva carries moderate disparity in ranking and hard-court experience, but Ferreira Silva's scrappy style and potential...
Best-of-five format at the US Open favors longer matches for players of this level. Both competitors show solid serve stats on hard but inco...
Given the US Open main draw is best-of-five sets, and both players are established professionals, a competitive match is likely. While Rodio...
While Rodionov is favored, Ferreira Silva is capable of winning sets, especially in the early stages of a Grand Slam if he plays with freedo...
Both players are evenly matched in terms of overall level, and five-set matches often extend when neither has a clear edge. Ferreira Silva's...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Jurij Rodionov
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Claude Haiku 4.5
Jurij Rodionov
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Jurij Rodionov
DeepSeek V3
Jurij Rodionov
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
aed3f29627f677b5…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31117,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Frederico Ferreira Silva",
"home": "Jurij Rodionov"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.