Julieta ParejavsLeolia Jeanjean
LJYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Leolia Jeanjean 3/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Leolia Jeanjean |
62%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Leolia Jeanjean Leolia Jeanjean has historically shown stronger consistency on hard courts and carries superior ranking and recent ATP/WTA trajectory compar...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 1.5 Without live 2026 data on serving form, break-point conversion, or recent head-to-head, this prediction assumes a competitive women's single... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Leolia Jeanjean |
58%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Leolia Jeanjean Training data through 2023 indicates Leolia Jeanjean possesses greater professional experience and stronger results on hard courts compared...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under_2.5 Training data through 2023 shows both players often close out matches in straight sets when facing lower-ranked opposition. Serve strength a... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Leolia Jeanjean |
60%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Leolia Jeanjean Based on my training data up to early 2023, Leolia Jeanjean is a recognized professional player with WTA tour experience, including a signif...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Given the perceived difference in experience and ranking between the two players based on available data, a straight-sets victory for the mo... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Julieta Pareja |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Julieta Pareja Based on my training data, Julieta Pareja is generally considered the stronger player between these two in women's singles tennis. Pareja ha...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given that Julieta Pareja is favored but Leolia Jeanjean is a capable opponent, this match is likely to be competitive. A competitive match... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Julieta Pareja |
55%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Julieta Pareja Based on training data through 2025-09, while neither player is highly ranked, Pareja's consistent performance on hard courts gives her a sl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_2.5 Given the players' moderate serve and return games, a two-set sweep is likely. Pareja's focus and experience in closing out matches, combine... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLeolia Jeanjean 3/5
Leolia Jeanjean has historically shown stronger consistency on hard courts and carries superior ranking and recent ATP/WTA trajectory compar...
Training data through 2023 indicates Leolia Jeanjean possesses greater professional experience and stronger results on hard courts compared...
Based on my training data up to early 2023, Leolia Jeanjean is a recognized professional player with WTA tour experience, including a signif...
Based on my training data, Julieta Pareja is generally considered the stronger player between these two in women's singles tennis. Pareja ha...
Based on training data through 2025-09, while neither player is highly ranked, Pareja's consistent performance on hard courts gives her a sl...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Without live 2026 data on serving form, break-point conversion, or recent head-to-head, this prediction assumes a competitive women's single...
Training data through 2023 shows both players often close out matches in straight sets when facing lower-ranked opposition. Serve strength a...
Given the perceived difference in experience and ranking between the two players based on available data, a straight-sets victory for the mo...
Given that Julieta Pareja is favored but Leolia Jeanjean is a capable opponent, this match is likely to be competitive. A competitive match...
Given the players' moderate serve and return games, a two-set sweep is likely. Pareja's focus and experience in closing out matches, combine...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Leolia Jeanjean
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Julieta Pareja
Grok 4 Fast
Leolia Jeanjean
Claude Haiku 4.5
Leolia Jeanjean
DeepSeek V3
Julieta Pareja
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
05c86d55c81697b6…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 9 · 18:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39787,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Kia Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-09T18:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 09 Sep 2026 18:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Leolia Jeanjean",
"home": "Julieta Pareja"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.